Should there be a mandatory entrance exam by Bar Council of India for law graduates to practice in courts? |
|
| Yes | 26 % |
 |
|
| No | 73 % |
|
|
|
| Can't Say | 0 % |
 |
|
| _ | 0 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 530 | |
| Submitted By - Prakash Yedhula | Read Comments |
| Posted by pawan sharma |
06/07/2010 15:39:12 |
| Exam, after exam is not good. | |
| Posted by NPKailaasam |
24/06/2010 19:46:41 |
| NO,It is not necessary to conduct an entrance exam to enroll in Bar council,it is like the matter that for a boy joining the school after passing entrance and this will leads to corroption.So,if It comes to effect then it must be done for existing Lawyers also.there must not be any partiality. | |
| Posted by shivangani |
18/06/2010 11:53:48 |
| The exam should be mandatory because it will improve the level of understanding and knowledge among students. | |
| Posted by Heaven 2011 |
17/06/2010 17:36:13 |
| Then what is the necessity of law colleges. Give up all study. Are we child to prove again and again. After all we are in service or in practise. What a joke!!!!!! Never, Never, never an exam again. | |
| Posted by ramit |
17/06/2010 11:43:37 |
| After studying 5 years in National Law University and clearing up 10 semester, is it still required to proove ourself????????? Moreover, who will give the assurance that this will not give rise to the CORRUPTION..................... | |
| Posted by ramit |
17/06/2010 11:40:02 |
| After studying 5 years in National Law University and clearing up 10 semester, is it still required to proove ourself????????? | |
| Posted by Jasvinder Singh |
16/06/2010 17:54:14 |
| Way the law coleges all over India have mushroomed, the quality education in law has definitely suffered rather lowered.To check the deterioration, it would be prudent that some Central/National University of Law should be established with a mandate to to hold Common Examination all over India,so that only those who desrve are able to enter the noble profession and those who want to sneek in by purchasing degrees-in-law could be eliminated. | |
| Posted by VIJAY K. TEOTIA |
16/06/2010 14:42:05 |
| to maintain dignity and seriousness of the profession it is necessary, it should not be taken as a competency test but to test inclination. | |
| Posted by Anindita Roy |
16/06/2010 13:28:46 |
| even though filtering will help the judiciary,but keeping in view the entrance fee and the viability of legal professionals this would be a setback.entance exam wont do much good as xpected and even evil practises can take place.hence it would be better to adere to the normal system and let lawyers hv their fate in their hans itself | |
| Posted by s.s.m.rajan |
16/06/2010 12:22:00 |
| If the BCI conduct the test for enrollment, that questioning the recognition given by the BCI to the universities. Moreover, the rule passed by BCI is against qualification for enrollment enunciate in the Advocates Act, 1961 | |
| Posted by SANJEEV KUMAR |
15/06/2010 21:25:02 |
| tHERE IS NO NEED FOR ENTRANCE EXAMS SINCE" MERIT HOLDERS DOES NOT MEAN GOOD LAWYERS". | |
| Posted by kalpana |
15/06/2010 21:12:45 |
| Yes | |
| Posted by pramod pandey |
15/06/2010 13:18:25 |
| law degree itself is a preparation for practising in courts. no need to repeat it unnecessarily. open book system of exam will make it a joke. Pramod Pandey | |
| Posted by Zafaka Chenkual |
15/06/2010 09:03:17 |
| When we go through a competition, there is a glorious feeling within us. I believe this will improve the standard of lawyers as well as people perception on lawyers. | |
| Posted by U.S.Moorthy |
14/06/2010 15:19:53 |
| the profession has to be cleansed of ignorant people | |
| Posted by kranthi |
14/06/2010 14:56:58 |
| entrance exam is compulsory because the real practitioners will come out,and trere should be age restriction for studying law | |
| Posted by amaranath |
14/06/2010 09:47:33 |
| by keeping the entrance exam, only serious practioners can be retained. | |
| Posted by Rashmi |
12/06/2010 16:47:07 |
| law graduation itself is a preparation for practising in courts. no need to repeat it unnecessarily | |
| Posted by Prabhu Mishra |
12/06/2010 14:39:12 |
| it is necessary for strengthening the profession. P.D.Mishra Advocate-Supreme court | |
| Posted by Kuljit Pal Singh |
12/06/2010 10:39:13 |
| Talent cannot not be recognised by putting common standard known as Exam.. Every body has its own positives and Negatives and the same came out and recognised by only one Exam i.e. Life!!! | |
| Posted by Krishnamoorthy kanniah |
11/06/2010 18:44:31 |
| I personally feel, the guidelines given by supreme court in this regard is getting implemented after much delay. Though a number of students passing out from law colleges, only about 10% are entering into practice law. In this context only those interested in practice law would give test to enroll themselves. I am sure this would serve as a refresher as well as a compete personality to practice law. | |
| Posted by priya |
10/06/2010 20:46:24 |
| Then it would be applicable to all the other professional courses like , eng , medicine so on for the sake of eligibility criteria to practice. | |
| Posted by ARVIND JAIN |
10/06/2010 15:11:31 |
| ITS REDICULOUS. | |
| Posted by Basavaraj |
09/06/2010 12:04:00 |
| I appreciate this system introduced by Govt of India. I feel that nowdays everybody doing Law (ex-military, company secretary, business man’s, unemployed @B.A. Graduates, C.A. Professionals) and every body would pass and get their enrollment certificate easily rather than putting efforts in studying. In order to filter them this system is must. | |
| Posted by vijay |
09/06/2010 06:16:57 |
| Qualifying exam is unnecessary.It is better to change the syllabus and give a merit base enrollment. | |
| Posted by Vijay Goyal |
08/06/2010 18:41:47 |
| Mandatory entrance exam shoul not for fresher BUT Efficincy check exam for exiting practising lawyer for to update them. | |
| Posted by raj kumar ji |
08/06/2010 14:36:55 |
| NO THERE IS NO ENTRANCE OF RAGISTRATION OF BAR COUNCIL | |
| Posted by Aniruddha Kale |
08/06/2010 14:35:32 |
| yes it should be mandetory beacause as there is no filtering process in law law field only gets quantity and no quality, peoples found easier to become lawyer and due which law field become over saturated so the exam should become mandetory and i think it also should contain oral exam in the type of moot court which make law student about friendlier regarding courts aspects, presentation, and bar exam should be modeled as US BAR Exam. | |
| Posted by RANJAN DEY CHOUDHURY |
07/06/2010 23:15:49 |
| EXAMINATION MAKES A MAN PERFECT AND AFTER ALL FILTERATION IS ESSENTIAL TO ASCERTAIN PRACTICAL PERSON WHO DEEMS TO BE FIT FOR HIS/HER PROFESSION FM FRESH PASSOUTS, OTHERWISE CONCRETE DECISION MAY TAKE LONG TIME IN EACH CASES. | |
| Posted by RANJAN DEY CHOUDHURY |
07/06/2010 23:09:25 |
| MANDATORY ENTRANCE EXAM SHOW THE PRESENCE OF MIND WHICH MAY IMPACT IN DAY TO DAY PRACTICE IN COURTS. | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
06/06/2010 12:38:29 |
| Kiran ji, if the quality of legal education has to improve, is it not required that BCI has to restrict mushrooming of such colleges? Where is the need to have entrance exam to filter from the passouts? | |
| Posted by Adv.Aiyer VLV |
06/06/2010 09:21:05 |
| Hey Correction The resolution says all advocates enrolled must pass and can not practice without passing. RESOLUTION No advocate enrolled under section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961 shall be entitled to practice under Chapter IV of the Advocates Act, 1961, unless such advocate successfully passes the All India Bar Examination conducted by the Bar Council of India. It is clarified that the Bar Examination shall be mandatory for all law students graduating from academic year 2009-2010 onwards and enrolled as advocates under Section 24 of the Advocates Act, 1961. That means from the time rule is notified and till the time exam results are out, no cases can be represented by any advocate enrolled under section 24, this means enrollment is allowed, practice barred for all. If so i welcome, but what chaos? no court proceedings till results. wonderful Bar i salute thee | |
| Posted by Kiran Kumar |
06/06/2010 06:05:32 |
| i believe its a good move, let the competent persons enter the profession...mushrooming of too many law colleges has downgraded the quality of legal education. | |
| Posted by Adv.Aiyer VLV |
05/06/2010 13:31:50 |
| BCI move deplorable Being incharge of legal education and exams, incl 30 exams @BU, it must have planned it 3 years ago or plan it 3 years ahead, incl in curriculum and ask persons to take it. if it feels quality of education was awful, what has it done to change it. curriculum is boring, exam mode memory mugging and vomiting. no new thinking. If it agrees what 30 exams it conducts is not producing quality how does it think, 31st is lucky medallion will be successful and right. why is it applicable only to current year students? what is the hurry? why not from next year or 3 year down the line? Is this rule not ultra vires the Act? Is this not retrospective application of law? here is classic case of offence by BCI and punishment meted out to students. Does the word Bar affect its functioning? | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
05/06/2010 06:14:21 |
| Is Doctor needs examination? Is engineer needs examination? why should budding lawyers need this? If that student get good marks, is Bar Council is ready to provide cases of MNCs for that student? | |
| Posted by Adv.Aiyer VLV |
04/06/2010 21:21:21 |
| absolutely true suchitra Let all from BCI stop practising, till they pass exam i will give them, let us see if they can pass. do they dare take the challenge. Many bandicoots thrive not by knowledge, skill but by other .......... BCI does not know how to control law education, give it to me, i will show you how to run the show. | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
04/06/2010 20:39:19 |
| It is violative of S.20 of BCI Act which gives eligibility for enrollment. Without amending that section, exams cannot be conducted. | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
04/06/2010 20:30:08 |
| Let BCI close all the law colleges and conduct entrance exams. When eligibility is to pass the entrance exam, Why one should spend unnecessary three years? | |
| Posted by Adv.Aiyer VLV |
04/06/2010 19:13:43 |
| Those who support please inform if you are lawyers or law students. if lawyers, voluntarily take the exam and do not practice till you pass ATB for failing | |
| Posted by Legal Eagle |
04/06/2010 16:13:49 |
| There are many better things the Bar Council can do rather than taking entrance exams Its the duty of the universities to decide whether or not a person is fit to pass the law exams or not. Lets not waste time. | |
| Posted by Adv.Aiyer VLV |
04/06/2010 15:47:31 |
| An idiotic statement of confession by government that its law course is not good enough to make professionals. Shame on the Bar Council of India, Law Ministry and all those universities just looking at cash registers to whom nothing complained registers. In one side, HRD is working towards removing multiple entrance exams, here we want to test new candidates. Why not test existing lawyers and remove them from Bar, even they came thro the same stinking system? | |
| Posted by Santhosh |
04/06/2010 12:36:24 |
| Do we believe in the competancy of our universities in conducting the exams ? If not let us have a separate "Legal Education Council" who would conduct exams and certify the lawyers rather than spending your good amount of time studying legal papers in a college and finally getting certified by the university and again appearing for another exam ! | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
