Should irretrievable breakdown of marriage be included as a ground for divorce by amending the Hindu Marriage Act,1955 |
|
| yes | 81 % |
 |
|
| no | 17 % |
|
|
|
| can't say | 3 % |
|
|
|
| - | 0 % |
 |
|
| Total Votes Cast : 114 | |
| Submitted By - Adv Archana Deshmukh | Read Comments |
| Posted by tara shankar pandey |
30/07/2010 21:25:46 |
| If both spouses are ready to be apart from the marital relationship of either of the grounds of i.b, then what is the harm in that, because already the relationship is at dead end and no hope remains once entering into the premises of the court. secondly at least the rising burden on the various forms of the courts will be reduced as such.. | |
| Posted by vivek tiwari |
29/07/2010 16:03:59 |
| yes Both the are living separate from each other an there is very less will of the party to stay with each other ! Though marriage is consider as a Sacred part of life but u should be willing by both the side n if there is complete breakdown in marrriage realationship then it should be one of the ground for the divorce As both cannot live there individual life get start or marry any other person till they are get divorced it is some where lossing Freedom to live with dignity and peace i.e Article 21 of the Consituation is some extented voilated | |
| Posted by Mukul Aggarwal |
28/07/2010 13:24:40 |
| It is really needed | |
| Posted by Adv Archana Deshmukh |
28/07/2010 06:59:04 |
| I agree with suchitra madam, once a couple reaches the court, practically the marriage is dead and there is seldom a possibility of reconciliation, except in few cases where the couples agrees for reconciliation for the 'sake of children', many a times the matter is dragged just to harrass the other spouse. And adding such a ground, will not do away the mandatory duty of the court to check for a possibility of reconciliation by sending the couple to the councellor. | |
| Posted by Adv Archana Deshmukh |
28/07/2010 06:59:04 |
| I agree with suchitra madam, once a couple reaches the court, practically the marriage is dead and there is seldom a possibility of reconciliation, except in few cases where the couples agrees for reconciliation for the 'sake of children', many a times the matter is dragged just to harrass the other spouse. And adding such a ground, will not do away the mandatory duty of the court to check for a possibility of reconciliation by sending the couple to the councellor. | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
27/07/2010 20:59:37 |
| When the couple have come before the court for divorce, it is seldom that there will be conciliation between the two. Instead of simply dragging the case and thereby making the couple grow quite old before they get a legal divorce, I think it is better to have such a ground which would give them faster relief prayed for. | |
| Posted by Chirag Bhatt |
25/07/2010 19:32:20 |
| As it is irretrievalbe breakdown of marriage, there is no hope and scope for reunion. In that case, it is better to be separated and there should not be any infriengement of Article 21 of Constitution of India, as first we are humanbeings and than we are Hindu. | |
| Posted by Chirag Bhatt |
25/07/2010 19:29:27 |
| As it is irretrievalbe breakdown of marriage, there is no hope and scope for reunion. In that case, it is better to be separated and there should not be any infriengement of Article 21, as first we are humanbeings and than we are Hindu. | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
25/07/2010 15:17:20 |
| . | |
| Posted by niranjan |
24/07/2010 15:55:28 |
| The courts were already following and now it is going to be law. | |
| Posted by pawan sharma |
22/07/2010 15:12:46 |
| I am not suport this ground bcz it ruin the theory of marriag in hindu law. I thinks, it gave a large suport to, in brack down theory and destroyed the hindu family. it made large effects on the socity, after 1976 amandment as added S.13B in HM Act. | |
| Posted by Rajesh Gurjar |
22/07/2010 09:54:18 |
| it should be included coz it is need of hour, and parties can get relived from troubling spouses | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
21/07/2010 22:45:14 |
| kiran kumar is right | |
| Posted by Kiran Kumar |
21/07/2010 22:35:50 |
| I am totally against this ground to be added to the Hindu Laws, in a mad race for money and power, we are loosing our moral standards and family commitments. The divorce and other matrimonial disputes litigation is rising day by day and this new ground is certainly going to ruin the Indian family structure. Rather there shall be some effort to reduce materialism and let the marriages be saved. Simply money has become basis of marriage, the morality and character is being abrogated from the society. | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
21/07/2010 07:21:53 |
| Though it gives quietus for many matrimonial disputes, the introduction of this system will water down the procedures and Family Courts will be flooded with newly married couples. Even sometimes, couples having small problems wont go for conciliation and will be ready for obtaining divorce | |
| Posted by Paramaanu |
19/07/2010 22:51:36 |
| Hindus should adopt oral marriages. Say Shadi Shadi Shadi 3 times to the proposed spouse, and get married. Say 2 times Divorce Divorce and be happy. Big parting reception be made compulsory to celebrate the divorce and Govt. should start Tatkal Divorce scheme.. if any one pays predecided amounts as Divorce Tax.. they shall get the divorce certificate immidiatly. Else .. next day.. | |
| Posted by Advocate Neha Kalra |
19/07/2010 21:19:14 |
| yeah, it should be introduced as a ground of divorce and HMA should be suitably amended as if two adult people think that they cannot live together then there is no point asking them to do so or reconciling their decision. after all, HMA allows only people above 18 years to get married. | |
| Posted by Yamalapalli Haribob |
19/07/2010 19:35:43 |
| the couples shall get immediate divorce,if they are not interested to live together | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
