Should the retirement age of High Court judges be increased from 62 to 65 years |
|
| Yes | 43 % |
 |
|
| No | 52 % |
|
|
|
| Can't Say | 4 % |
|
|
|
| Others | 0 % |
 |
|
| Total Votes Cast : 157 | |
| Submitted By - pawan sharma | Read Comments |
| Posted by Shaulabh Shah |
14/08/2010 16:16:24 |
| because we can utilize their experience in the positive manner. | |
| Posted by M/s. Y-not legal services |
14/08/2010 11:06:42 |
| Experience is more strength to our judiciary pillar. | |
| Posted by K.C.Suresh |
11/08/2010 05:26:18 |
| The efficiancy of a Judge wittl not vanish by 62 if it is vanishing in the case of SC Judges. The work load, the appreciation, the way of thinking etc are almost same. So why giving this 62 old folks to Tribukalxs and Enquiry Commisions. The age of all the criminal and civil presiding officers, judges both of HC and SC must be same. K.C. Suresh, Advocate | |
| Posted by ANIL KUMAR TRIPATHI |
10/08/2010 23:21:45 |
| new people come in the feild of judisery with new idea | |
| Posted by Rohtash Babu Patel |
10/08/2010 19:09:25 |
| but have a suggestion , corresponding age for consideration should be enhanced to 60 years | |
| Posted by raj kumar ji |
10/08/2010 13:39:29 |
| ya the retirement age of high court judges can be increased frm 62 to 65 years . | |
| Posted by Vivek Deo |
08/08/2010 19:30:47 |
| After retiring at the age of 62 the High Court Justices serve as Arbitrators or are appointed to head Commissions. Hence, an increase of 3 yars to make it 65 will give the High Court Justices more time to serve. 65 is ideal age to retire. The higher Judiciary needs experience more than youth, it is not a childs play to be a High court Justice. The age of 65 is best, 62 is too less as these Hon'ble Justices are used to Aristrocatic lives. | |
| Posted by madan kumar tiwary |
08/08/2010 18:56:14 |
| old judges are not techno savvy, even they are against the use of science and technology, instead of increasing age limit, all those not having knowledge of new technology should be asked to go under training. | |
| Posted by madan kumar tiwary |
08/08/2010 18:51:06 |
| virtually we lack quality and any relaxation in age limit will only compell to bear undeserving lots. | |
| Posted by M.G.RAJESWRI |
08/08/2010 13:11:17 |
| If this has been introduced soon, we may had PSDJ (Justice Prabha Sridevan) for three more yrs. | |
| Posted by rajesh vishwani |
05/08/2010 15:35:19 |
| surely increase | |
| Posted by Madhusudan Mishra |
04/08/2010 10:13:16 |
| In my point of view after the age of 60 mental power and working capacity of the person goes down they can appoint as a consultant but not appoint as a decision maker. | |
| Posted by NARSING RAOJI KALYAANKAR |
03/08/2010 19:41:06 |
| this is very good deciation | |
| Posted by adv. rajeev ( rajoo ) |
03/08/2010 18:42:46 |
| What is the necessity of increasing the age limit. Absolutely it is rubbish. | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
03/08/2010 07:27:31 |
| No need to increase the age limit. nowadays white collar crimes and cyber crimes emerges as challenging factor to face. More than than economic offences at its high time. Old judges are not able to understand these thing even if Advocate try to clarify. They still rely on papers and notices. | |
| Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
01/08/2010 23:28:19 |
| . | |
| Posted by Kiran Kumar |
31/07/2010 18:20:11 |
| i agree with Suchitra ji, otherwise also in India its more like a political posting now so 62 is enough :P | |
| Posted by Suchitra. S |
31/07/2010 17:36:25 |
| Just because increasing the retirement age of High Court judges will require a constitutional amendment which needs two-third majority in both Houses of Parliament,raising the retirement age of judges seems ridiculous. Let there be inflow of young and able judges into the system. I suppose 62 years is enough time to serve as a judge. | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
