Is Three-Way Ayodya Judgement by Allahabad HC is prounounced keeping in view of the best interests of the country |
|
Yes. HC was concerned with the sensitivity of the Dispute | 57 % |
No HC Verdict paved way for further litigation in the Supreme Court on Appeal | 15 % |
Verdict Enabled all major political parties to Unite to maintain peace and harmony in the county | 13 % |
HC Bench took the evidence of ASI as the primary proof to judge the title of the disputed site | 15 % |
Total Votes Cast : 46 | |
Submitted By - Parthasarathi Loganathan | Read Comments |
Posted by pawan sharma |
05/10/2010 17:26:44 |
yes, it is prounounced in the best interests of the country. | |
Posted by Arati Gawde |
05/10/2010 13:27:15 |
Yes, agree with this statement. | |
Posted by Basavaraj |
05/10/2010 12:40:14 |
Yes: HC has passed the historic judgment on INDIAN people. It is people judgment not for single party judgment. | |
Posted by Advocate Neha Kalra |
03/10/2010 15:30:49 |
Yes, it is indeed a gud judgment and the Hon'ble Court has been succesful in giving a balanced judgment, which is in best public interest. | |
Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
03/10/2010 07:45:39 |
Better to decide this issue like this. Now the scope of appeal before Supreme Court is very limited and it cannot travel beyond the finding of the High Court. | |
Posted by vijay sahni |
02/10/2010 18:21:51 |
Lets settle the matter once for all & move for united & secular India. Its a Good judgement | |
Posted by Sanjay Kumar Singh |
01/10/2010 20:32:48 |
. | |
Posted by Kirti Kar Tripathi |
01/10/2010 18:52:49 |
The suits relate with title dispute, the same could only be decided on the basis of evidence. The report of ASI was only conclusive proof, which could answer the specific issued framed in the suits. | |