please help,
complainant have mention that accused have issued the cheque on this date and he has issued the cheque on that day.
but on both the dates accused was out of town .
how to defend in this case
rahul (md) 29 November 2014
please help,
complainant have mention that accused have issued the cheque on this date and he has issued the cheque on that day.
but on both the dates accused was out of town .
how to defend in this case
Advocate dishi (AM LEGAL) 29 November 2014
territorial jurisdiction
Summons are sent and served through police station where accused is residing. The summons can also be served by speed post or by authorized courier service and if not accepted will be treated as duly served
A Cheque is a bill of exchange drawn upon a specified banker & not to be expressed to be payable otherwise then on demand.
1. In Writing
2. Unconditional order
3. specified banker
4. payment to a specified person
5. Payable on demand
6. Specified sum of money
7. Signature
When a Cheque is presented to a bank for payment & if it is not paid, it is said to be “dishonored” or "bounced".
Check is a negotiable instrument and bouncing of a cheque is a Criminal Offence, which is governed by NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENT ACT, 1881. It is punishable by up to 2 yrs of imprisonment.
REASONS OF DISHONOUR
1- signature not matched
2- overwriting in cheque
3- presented in bank after completion of six month
4- Account closed
5- Insufficient funds
6- Payment stop by account holder
7- Opening balance insufficient
8- Amount differs in words & figures
9- In case of company without seal of company
10- Account number not matched
11- In case of joint accounts only one account holder sign but both signature are required.
12- On the death of customer
13- On the insolvency of customer
14- On the insanity of a customer
15- On Garnishee order
16- In case of crossed cheques
17- When cheque is issued against the rules of trust.
18- Alteration
19- Doubtful
20- Other branch cheque
21- OD limit crossed
The word negotiable instrument means a document, the ownership of which can be transferred. According to section 13 of Indian negotiable instrument Act 1881 “A negotiable instrument means a promissory note, bill of exchange, or cheque payable either to order or to the bearer.”
Justice K.C WILLIS defines a negotiable instrument as one in which the property is acquired by any one who takes it bone fide, & for value notwithstanding any defect of title in the person from whom he took it.
1- Notice should be given to the payer within 1 month of the dishonor of the cheque.
2- After notice, 15 days should be given to the payer for payment.
3- If the payment is not made within 15 days by a payer, a suit can be filed in the court with in one month after the 15 days notice period.
4- Period of notice is necessary before a suit can be instituted.
Importance of LIMITATION PERIOD
The case must be filed within 30 days after completion of the notice period of 15 days. For example…
Notice received by defaulter on 5 November, now one needs to wait for 15 days i.e. up to 20 November. If the payment is not received in these 15 days, a case can be filed within the next 30 days i.e. before 20th Dec. If the case is filed on 21st Dec, it will be dismissed by the court.
If a notice is not given within 1 month after the cheque has bounced, then the check needs to be presented in the bank again and a notice can then be issued after the check bounces.
Steps for giving notice & for filing a suit in the court:
Court Process for filing a case
Dalip Singh (Advocate) 29 November 2014
This is very important point. In case you were not present in the town on the date of the cheque is issued, the question of handing over the cheque on the date mentioned does not arise at all. But you have to prove in the court that you were out of town on those days. See what documents will help you to prove that you were out of town.
rahul (md) 29 November 2014
sir,
on both days at the time of loan taken i was not in town .
secondly at the time of cheque issued or boucned i was not in town ,
so how can i prove that i have not issued the cheques.
Hardeep (Business) 29 November 2014
rahul (md) 29 November 2014
sir,
but for the complainat has to prove that execution of cheque by accused and if we prove the witness and complainant is lying than we can rebute the preasumption.
R Trivedi (advocate.dma@gmail.com) 30 November 2014
Rahul,
Complainant would have stated generally about cheque issue and receipt in is affidavit / complaint.
ensure proper cross examination of complainant and try to secure his statement that cheque was handed over to him by you on that day at so and so place.
Parallely secure evidence like cell record etc (and more) of your being out of station on that day. If he states a fixed date and you can prove that you were out on that date, then you are safe.
T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate) 03 December 2014
This is a matter of defence to be adopted during cross examination of the complainant. If you are very perfectly sure that you were not available in the town on both the occasions, you must prove that by letting in your own evidence with the help of documentary proofs that you rely upon to establish your statement. Consult your lawyer on this issue for proper follow up.