Divorce question

Dear Author,

I want to know that during the compromise what were the conditions. U can call me at 9871158578

ACCORDING TO THE LAW OF THE LAND; SHE HAS THE RIGHT TO DO SO. ALSO YOU HAVE THE RIGHT TO PROOVE IT FALSE. THEREAFTER CHARGE DEFAMATION

YOU PUT YOUR SETTLEMENT PAPERS BEFORE THE COURT WHERE DIVORCE PETITION PENDING. IT WILL HELP YOU.

SHE CAN NOT APPEAL AGAINST THAT ORDER BUT CAN FILE A FRESH CASE.

SHE DID IT .

NOW YOU PRAY ALONGWITH THE SAID PAPERS BEFORE THE COURT THAT THE MATTER ALREADY JUDICIALLY DECIDED, HENCE RESJUDICATA.

RESJUDICATA. MEANS ALREADY JUDICIALLY DECIDED.

AS MATTER  ALREADY JUDICIALLY DECIDED, THEREFORE NO COURT CAN TAKE ACTION AGAINST IT.

IF THE LOWER COURT DO NOT HEAR YOU  THEN YOU HAVE TO GO TO HC, NO OTHER WAY.

I agree to Mr Prabhakar's thoughts. On one side you talk of settlement of issues before 'panchayat' then you got confused about settlement of issues before a "Lok Adalat". Both are different entity for same question i.e of settlement. Check and revert actually where actually the 'settlement' took place and what were the points of settlement for correct advise.

you can prove that the cases are withdrawn after payment of lump sum and can contest the case

Thanks for your replies...

I onlu know how they tortured me and my family for this lumpsum amount. They even didnot allow us to apply for a anticipatory bail.

In lokadalat she withdraw the cases saying she has compromised by getting lumpsum amount of money.
My question is if I prove the accusations were false in divorce case, then lokadalat compromise should not be valid right?? How to get justice in this?