LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Sushil Kumar Bhatia (Advocate)     08 January 2009

Examination in chief

Dear,
       A title suit has been filed by three co plaintiffs in evidence of plaintiff only husband of one of the plaintiffs produce himself as examination in chief as plaintiffs .whether husband can be produced before the court in examination of chief instead of plaintiffs.


Learning

 9 Replies

AEJAZ AHMED (Legal Consultant/Lawyer)     09 January 2009

DEAR BHATIA,


Your question is not clear to me, and unable to understand.


i) Whether, Three Co-Plaintiffs themself filed the suit ?


ii) Or the suit was filed by Husband of one of the Plaintiff as Attorney Holder?


iii) If, the suit was filed by the co-plaintiffs themself, why they didn't comeforward for evidence ?


iv) What happend about their evidence, when they themselves  didn't comeforward for evidence ?


v) When Plaintiffs themselves, neither comeforward for their evidence nor they filed there evidence in Chief-Examinations, how the Hon'ble Court prmitted them to" Produce Husband of one of the Plaintiff " ?


vi) The suit in dispute is a " TITLE SUIT " filed by the three Co-Plaintiffs, then, by whome the documents will be "MARKED AS EXHIBIT" in the said suit. ?


vii) Whether, the Hon'ble Court prmitted them to proceed as above without any objection ?


Its' ok,  if the situation is either as stated by you or as per above,  if you need, you are having full right to " CALL FOR THE THREE (3) Co-Plaintiffs for examination/evidence" .


But, as per me,


i) It is the correct Procedure, the plaintiffs themselves have to come forward first  and should have file their Evidence and " The Hon'ble Court also should have to insist them for the same" .


ii) And on their failure to do so, their (Plaintiff's) evidence should have to be recorded as  "NIL/CLOSED", and suit may be decided as "ex-pate". 

K.C.Suresh (Advocate)     09 January 2009

Q not clear. legible pl

D.V.RamaKrishna (Advocate)     09 January 2009

Mr.Sushil Kumar,


With reference to your question, pleae refer to Order XVIII of CPC, titled "HEARING OF THE SUIT AND EXAMINATION OF WITNESSES", under which


Rule 3 states in the following terms :


 Or XVIII R3 :- Evidence where there are several issues : -


 Where there are several issues, the burden of proving some of which lies on the other party, the party begining may, at his option, either produce his evidence on those issues or reserve it by way of answer to the evidence produced by the other party; and, in the latter case, the party beginning may produce evidency on those issues after the other party has produced all his evidence, and the other party may then reply specially on the evidence so produced by the party beginning; but the party beginning will then be entitled to reply in generally on the whole case.


Or XVIII R 3-A : - Party to appear before other witnesses : -


Where a party himself wishes to appear as a witness, he shall so appear before any other witness on his behalf has been examined, unless the court, for reasons to be recorded, permits him to appear as his own witness at a later stage.


Thus w.r.t. your query, the husband of the plaintiff can definitely be produced as witness irrespective of the fact whether the husband of the plaintiff is a party to the suit or not.

Sushil Kumar Bhatia (Advocate)     09 January 2009

Dear,


             The suit was filed by the three co plaintiffs showing their title & interest in property in suit all are ladies husband of one of the plaintiffs making pairvi in this case .the suit was filed and verification on the personal knowledge of co plaintiff who have signed the plaint ,there is no power of attorney either of plaintiffs Can husband be treated as PW-1 ,I have made objection on Examination in chief of the husband instead of plaintiffs own chief.

RAKHI BUDHIRAJA ADVOCATE (LAWYER AT BUDHIRAJA & ASSOCIATES SUPREME COURT OF INDIA)     09 January 2009

I do agree with Mr.  D.V.RamaKrishna he is absolutely right.

Srinivas.B.S.S.T ( Advocate)     09 January 2009

Sir, you have to examine one of the Plaintiffs as P.W.-1 beacuse the person capable of deposing about the title over any property is the person who is having the title. If you think that the plaintiffs cannot stand to tirrade of questions in the cross examination, then you can examine the wife of so called husband as P.W.-1 only to the extent that she is the co-owner  of the property along with other Plaintiffs and her husband used to look after matters pertaining to the property. Then you can examine the husband as P.W.-2. 

Sushil Kumar Bhatia (Advocate)     09 January 2009

Thanx to all

Ajay kumar singh (Advocate)     10 January 2009

Yes. Please see sec. 120 of the Evidence Act.

M.Sahul Hameed (Advocaate (Ph: 9443070567))     10 January 2009

if the witness is a competent to capable of giving evidence and also the witness well aware the facts personally disclosed, which is culled from the documents, prior to give evidence one of the plaintiff should obtained permission from the court with explain reasons for examin as a witness.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register