LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

vikram singh (na)     08 July 2015

Money credit from a fradulent bank identified account

cheque was issued to a 3rd party(fradulent account later identified by bank) from savings account of self  through a known common friends relative account.later 3rd party returned part amount to the account of which self is a joint holder..now bank is claiming that as 3rd party is a fradulent account,money has to be reversed to bank  as common friend & his relative account have been identified as fradulent account.can loan be odd amonuts like 45999,47777 any reason to mention for same



Learning

 6 Replies

SIVARAMAPRASAD KAPPAGANTU (Retired Manager)     09 July 2015

Matter is not clear enough to consider giving any views.  Please narrate enitre episode with relevant names (if you wish change the names), amount/s and dates, name of the Bank/branch  in which each account is maintained.

 

Give a chronological account of the events with dates, names and account numbers etc.

1 Like

vikram singh (na)     09 July 2015

Mr T has given amount of Rs. 45,999/- vide Cheque. dated 28.09.2013  to Mr X and Rs. 4,987/- vide  cheque dt. 05.10.2013. to Mr X. Subsequently T had given an amount of Rs. 47,777/- vide cheque No.  dt. 24.01.2014 to Mr Y. X & Y are relatives of Mr K where K & T are colleagues working together in same bank.Loan were lent on the request from from Mr K.

Later K, from the account Mr Y  Rs. 35,777/- was credited into an HUF Account in which mr T is coparcenor on 04.09.2014 via cheque and Rs. 14,000/- was credited on 03.12.2014 via ATM Tranfer from Mr X account. On 20.5.2015 it was found that X,Y &Z( account of MR K )is a fraudulent account which is identified by bank & Mr K is behind bars for fradulous activity from May 2015.Jusify the transactions & why such odd amounts were given as loan instead of round amounts for T support.

vikram singh (na)     14 July 2015

Matter is confidential & very serious.Experts please advise & give your views on top priority. Justify T transactions

SAINATH DEVALLA (LEGAL CONSULTANT)     14 July 2015

It is not a question to be raised whether the loan amounts are odd or even.Even now UR entire query is confusing as U have failed in UR expression.Can U elaborate about the so called fradulent account? There is something more involved in the transactions if they are  really true.

1 Like

vikram singh (na)     14 July 2015

Since bank internal investigation is there, they are pressurizing T for earlier transactions done in 2013-2014.T working for bank in present context.Due to some kind of activity by K ,K is behind bars & accounts of K & his relatives X & Y are identified as fraudulent by the bank in the investigation by police & bank jointly.There is nothing more involved in the transaction, it is simply amount lent as loan which has to be repaid a later point of time basing on the request of K

vikram singh (na)     17 July 2015

Matter is confidential & very serious.Experts please advise & give your views on top priority. Justify T transactions.Its internal investagation of the bank for which bank is asking written explanation for the points mentioned above.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register