Experts have rightly warned against going for second marriage based on the facts stated......
I somehow feel that the querist is not stating correct facts of the case , there are so many contradictory statements. i fail to understand why the sister got secretely married and came back in 1hrs time to attend her college (as if she went for shopping ) and never got back with her husband for 2yrs. Sister denied physical relation , boy harassed his own wife for s*x, then the querist say they wanted to get sister married to the same guy but he and his family was not ready, and on top of it hes not giving divorce...........................
what is the boy expecting then ? he is neither getting to stay with his wife nor asking for money.....
I'm not criticizing someone's private life , but what happens is many times querist try to cover the real facts of the case and seek advice based on what they feel they would be presenting to the court. The case at the evidence stage then takes a different turn when the opposite lawyer during cross examination exposes the real facts to the court.
I would advice the querist to be careful in drafting the matter on paper, how you present the case to court along with evidences will be critical for winning the case.