Los Angeles Times June 3, 2010 :
"A Michigan man exercised right to silence by refusing to talk to police for nearly three hours. His interrogators asked him if he had asked God for forgiveness for shooting another man to death. The US Supreme Court ruled 5 to 4 that his one-word answer — "Yes" — was admissible because he hadn't explicitly invoked his right to silence to stop the police questioning."
Dear friends, since above verdict has been given by majority, it invites serious debate on Law of evidence. Further, is above statement admissible under Indian Evidence Act, had it been a case before Indian Court?
