Shocking decision given by family court - pls guide vv urgen

Originally posted by : Krishna
	Dear Experts, Girl had moved Section 24 application for interim manintenance. I have proved in the court that she had filed false affidavit as she conceal her true qualification and also conceal her previous work experience. I have given reference of Hon'ble High Court judgements e.g Mamta Jaiswal versus Rajesh jaiswal in the court of MP, 2. Indermeet singh sawhney versus damanpreet kaur. 3. veeka agarawal versus rajesh agarwal, in the district court of delhi. Moreover i have submitted 340 application and its accepted by the court but not initimate other party to file reply on 340 (perjury). Despite all the material evidence provided in the family court at the time of arguments court have decided maintenance of 7000 p.m. Please guide me what should be my next step. Should i file revision petition in the same court or file appeal in Hon'ble High Court.   Rgds, Krishna

As you have already pleaded before judge to reduce the amount, you can seek intervention of HC to reduce amount.

Good Luck

Helphing hand suggestion is correct.

Hi Experts,

So far i have not applied for any remedy. Please suggest what is best possible solution. Moreover judge is not concerned about 340 application. Please guide.

7000 rupees per month cannot be called a shocking judgement.

www.mehnat.in

It is shocking that refuting all evidences, however rich the lady is, and however constrained the man is deault judgement is given in favour of the ladies.

not shocking

my wife earning 35 K / month in govt job got money u/s 24, whereas my own income was nowhere on record.

sec. 24 order is just an interlocutory order & operates only till the disposal of the main petition

now file writ and also prey for sec. 21B.

1. Your recourse is now only before Hon'ble D HC as it is a FC decision.
2. It may be called shocking if we know what was your considered income as all we hear in this brief is one side's version r/w seasoned advocate pleadings were missing here!

Dear Tajobs and amit,

Thanks for your reply. I have also file 340 which is accepted by the court but not given instruction to other party to file reply on it. Please suggest how can i go further.

perjury application, if filed, is decided first. 

it stops the proceeding of the main petition.

so perjury should be filed at the end, if one wishes not to delay his own petition.

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Speedy-trial-21-b-research-56620.asp