Update on dv case

I dont think so the judge is going to pass IM as you have already proved she is a working women . Now the main case would follow that is her cross examination would take place and so would your cross examination too take place after which arguments would follow and than outcome would be known .

Did she mention that she was not working and you proved that the she is working ?

 The judge would not pass the IM application as she is able to maintain her self..

Could the experts  comment , if the judge could grant maintenance in the final order  in this case ?

Does DV has to be proven ? or just what the girls say is considered as DV , ( no evidence required ?)

For any relief to be passed DV has to be proved .

Instead of wasting time here in the forum and also in the court ruinning behind DV case.

Go for settlement.

Get rid of headache by arranging settlement amount.  One hand u pay other hand u get divorce.

I suppose you have already spent 2-3 years now already behind this case.

you wont achieve anything proving or disproving DV.

just get MCD and marry someone else when u have age.

age gone running behind court, you wont even find proper gal if you grow old later on.

Words of wisdom:  Think deep, act fast, time and tide wait for none.

agree with stanley.