Sachin Bhatia's Expert Profile

Queries Replied : 2563

+ View Full Profile

What kinds of questions I can and can't answer?

My area of expertise

My experience in the area (years):

Organizations I belong to:

Publications or writing which has appeared :

Educational credentials:

Award & Honors:

skanthahyd says : Hindu Succesion act
ear All, My Brother (hindu male) died intestate in 2004. He leaves behind widow, 2 minor daughters and mother. My father executed a registered will about 24 years back as per the will of my father my brother and myself got each 4 acreas of land. My elder mother has registered settlement deed in favour of my brother ,through that settlement deed my brother got another 3 acreas of land. what are the rights of the mother,widow and the 2 daughters on the properties of the deceased. Plz coment on this with recent judgements.

Mohammed siraj zariwala says : please give your advice for 138
138 dishonored of forged rubber stamp cheque Which was stolen and kept by expartner of a company bears single signature *****Mr x was a partner in co at the time of his retirement dispute arised and they settle the matter with the panch (Freinds). panch made the settlement on plain paper with all signatory to settle the amount for Rs 5000000 to be paid to mr x for retirement in 3months period After some 45 days accordingly in front of the panch and their legal advocate the dispute was settle and transaction was settle mr x sign the deed of retirement on stamp paper made by their legal advocate in which it was clearly mentioned that full and final settlement and nothing is due to mr x at the time of his retirement and the last amount of settlement rs 300000/- given in cheque to mr x for which he provided the receipt and 2more partner enter the company accused no 3 and 4 *** 1)Mr X had 10yrs old Blank cheque of accused no1 with single signature of accused no2 his brother which he had stolen when he was a partner of accused no1 *** 2)accused no1 co since its incorporation had signature of any two partners in bank for transaction Mr. X used this old blank and stolen cheque of company bearing single signature of accused no2 filled the cheque for rs 3500000 and put the duplicate rubber stamp of accused no1 and deposited in the bank to made a false 138 case As soon as cheque bounced before the action of complainant the accused no 3 file a complaint (case no 1) in the court for forgery of cheque under sec 156(3) against Mr x which put a duplicate rubber stamp of co and was a 10yrs old stolen blank cheque bearing single signature of accused no 2, certified by the bankers of accused no 1 that it was a 10 yrs old cheque. Order was passed against mr x and was arrested he tried to get the bail in session but was rejected on the ground since he was the ex partner of the company he was knowing the company bank transaction norms than why did he accept the single signature sign than Mr x went for quashing the matter in high court but was rejected but got the bail from high court *****case no2: for the same cheque 138 filed for cheque bouncing case by complainant mr x for Rs 3500000/-against the four accused given below: He had his bankerâ€™s cheque bounce receipt which mentioned 1) Payment stopped by the drawer 2) Drawers signature incomplete/requires Accused no1: Is the company Accused no2: partner of accused no1 and brother of complainant mr x (also ex partner of the accused no1) Accused no3: partner of accused no1 and son Of accused no2 Accused no4: partner of accused no1 and Son of accused no2 Present status of the matter : ****case no 1: mr x expired and the forgery case is also finish since the accused is no more ****case no 2: original complainant mr x expired and the case is run by substitute mr y his son Cheque is with the I.O and application had been filed by Mr y to start the case with secondary evidence Xerox of the cheque since I.O. is not sending the cheque to the 138court inspite of several reminder of the court. His application had been rejected and a fresh notice is issued to concerned police station to send the cheque to the 138 court Some advocates in lawyersclunindia had given answer that: N.I.ACT SECTION 138 DOES NOT ATTRACT HENCE NO CASE MADE OUT Than how come my case is still pending in 138 court Cani I apply for discharge of the matter or go for quashing if yes on which ground or judgment please advice

raman says : delhi rent control act14(d)
Can a widow owner get back her premises from tenant using 14d of Delhi rent control act-read full before answer? Please explain practical use of Section 14-d, which was inserted in 1988 in Delhi rent control act, according to which if a widow has given a property on rent and if she demands, she can get an immediate recovery of her property. Is it true?When I discussed with 4-5 different advocates, none was aware of this provision. Why is it so that most of the advocates donâ€™t even know about this provision, is it not in practice and if yes why? What is the meaning of word â€œImmediate Recovery of possessionâ€, how much â€œimmediateâ€ it is? Practically how much time is taken by courts to resole such cases i.e. cases filed by widows under section 14-d of DRC? Can I get some record of Court decisions and other proceedings of such cases during last one year? What if the complainant, i.e. widow dies during court cases? Would her children or legal heir be given the same value by the court or the whole scenario of the case will be changed and the case will go on dragging for decades? Actually my mom is that widow and I am his only son ? I am living along my mother&wife&child and she had a single property of three rooms in her name of which one room my father gave on rent to a widow woman with two child's.i know were she use to live earlier. now she is not even paying the rent, and harassing my mom in different ways? We never entered any written agreement with that tenant and we have never given him any receipt of rent also. Neither we nor he has any written proof of tenancy or rent mutually settled. Actually the rent of that property is below Rs. 3500/--per month. We are thinking of filing a suit against him under 14-D of DRC, we even fear that my mother may be killed by that tenant because she is living alone there in that house. Is there any provision of filing some summary suit in such cases through which we may repossess our property quickly? Please suggest the best, quickest & easiest legal way get our propertyâ€™s possession back. Plz. help, we are in great trouble.Is my mother's witness compulsory?

Raj says : Hi
Hi Sachin, I require your advice on cyber defamation. 1. Will it become a defamation, if a email forwarded by my relative is being forwarded to another relative by me notifying the relevant person. Eg. A is my sister and C is my cousin and B is me. if A forwards an email which is addressed to C to B, then if B forwards the email to C marking bcc to D, who is also a relative of A,B,C, with the intention of advising C to correct himself and by requesting D to advice C to live with A. Will this be a cyber defamation ? 2. In the above question, will it again become a defamation, if BB ( Mother of B ), is being defamed by CC ( mother of C ) which is the root cause of sending the email to relatives (Not to public) . 3. Will it be a cyber defamation, if email is circulated within relatives ?

anuradha says : Sir, Can I chat with u?
Sir, Can I chat with u?

Click here to see all answered queries

Comment Please

Other LCI Experts

Rajendra K Goyal
Queries Replied : 53581

Raj Kumar Makkad
Queries Replied : 44370

Devajyoti Barman
Queries Replied : 34799