498a charges fixed - 9 months on

Hi Hariom

There are lot of people who are or have gone through similar case of false 498a, dowry and divorce petitions and they need good strategy and advice through legal professionals to prove innocence.

It is imperative to note here that 498a cases are criminal in nature unlike civil or family disputes wherein normal advice of civil lawyer may not be beneficial to achieve the end goal, hence you need advice from a expert criminal lawyer and get consultation from efficient Supreme Court or High Court lawyers who can actually give you good strategy to build your case.

The practical difficulty is such that it gets difficult to find a reliable lawyer on your own. However now finding a lawyer who has expertise in criminal litigation is not difficult.

You can go to lawkonect.com which specialises in providing expert lawyer consultations to people who are caught in false 498a or divorce or dowry cases quickly and efficiently.

Hope this information will help and will give better incentives to victims of false 498a better counseling and vigilant consultation experience.

Regards

Well, thx 4 ur advice but I don't see any Gurgaon lawyers on your website. Apart from that, your reply doesn't answer any of the queries raised!

@querist

did FIR include ipc323?

 regards ASHOK

The charges are framed like that only.

 

The magistrate charges you for the any offence followed by questions like:

 

Do you agree to the said charges; or you wish trial.

The accused denies the charges and wishes a trial. And signs it.

 

Magistrate is not trying to frame you. You could have consulted your lawyer at the time of framing of charges.

 

Regards,

@Ashok! Yes, the FIR included 323 but what judge mentioned in the 323 charge was nowhere mentioned in the FIR.

@Shonee! It may be the difference of paperwork in different districts but my uncle who is a senior lawyer told me the charges usually start with "You are charged with...." and not with "I assaulted...". It's a difference of "You" and "I".

Had a chat with a PP, a friend, who told me it doesn't matter and in Gurgaon it starts with "I" instead of "You". Though I feel it's wrong and an admission of guilt can be obtained very easily fraudulently like this.

@author if FIR included ipc 323 then may be in her crpc 161 statements to IO she gave details of marpeet. You should have got these statements along with chargesheet submitted by IO to court. crpc211 to crpc 213 specifies details that should be given while framing of charges like date and place of offence,relevant sections of IPC and if required ,how was the offence committed.there doesn't seem to be any thing suspicious.You can reaffirm it with your lawyer in case of doubt. regards ASHOK

@ashok, in the challan I got, there is no 161 statement of complainant. I think they have merely taken the FIR statement of my 498a babe as basis.

 

But still, there is chance of a fraud when charges start with "I" rather than "You". I mean its the judge who's charging you and not you who's admitting guilt.

 

Thanks though!