Abuse of public money on behalf of public sector

The aforesaid RTI with annexures is attached.

another use less thread. 

time pass

Complaint in the matter of writ petition no. 429/2014 Bombay High Court

Thu, Jul 3, 2014 at 11:58 AM

To: hcaur.mah@nic.in Cc: supremecourt@nic.in, vijay.bhalla@nic.in Bcc: info.nia@gov.in, information@cbi.gov.in, cybercell.mumbai@mahapolice.gov.in,

Kind attention:- 1.The Registrar Hon’ble High Court of Bombay Dr Kane Road, Fort, Mumbai, 400032                                                                                                                                                                   2.The Registrar Hon’ble Supreme Court of India New Delhi

3. Chief Information Commissioner, Room No.306, II Floor, August Kranti Bhavan, Bhikaji Cama Place New Delhi - 110 066

Please find attachment for your information and necessary action. regards,

what is your query?

 

what help you want from this forum?

 

3.09.14 Appeal: RTI 30.06.2014 in the matter of embezzlement of public money   <revribhav2@gmail.com> Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 9:27 AM To: "renjeet.gangadharan" <renjeet.gangadharan@newindia.co.in>, gsrinivasan@newindia.co.in Cc: jsba-dfs@newindia.co.in, "pranabkumar.sahu" <pranabkumar.sahu@newindia.co.in> The chairman/First Appellate Authority New India Assurance Co. Ltd Fort,Mumbai Please find attached RTI appeal As the CPIO of Insurance company adopted bureaucratic approach of red tapism to cover up embezzlement of public money,the attached first appeal under the RTI act has been filed. regards

TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS                TIME PASS               

Modus Operandi of abuse of public money and incite hatred against an honest RTI applicant citizen of India.

 

During entire calendar years 2010-2013 those in the Central Public Information (CPI) Cell deliberately misread the notice(s) of the Central Information Commission (with copy to appellants ,e.g. the complainant) to attend video conference.

Instead the complainant witnessed systematic loss of public money of approx. Rs. 10000/- to 25000/- per person to claim habitual ,uncalled for Delhi tour.

That there are 4 Companies in the General Insurance Public Sector:- National Insurance Co. Ltd, (NICL) H.O. Kolkata New India Assurance Co. Ltd,(NIACL) H.O. Mumbai Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd,(OICL) H.O.New Delhi United India Insurance Co. Ltd, (UIICL) H.O. Chennai

It was only the NIACL officials who, in collusion with internal audit/vigilance were seen incurring lavish expenses of public money in the garb of personal visit ,

e.g. on 17.05.2013 . Appeal/decision no. of CIC NIACL FAA/CPIO Flight from CIC/DS/A/2012/002690 J.K. Lakhanita Indore/Bhopal CIC/DS/A/2012/002364 A.L. Madan Chandigarh CIC/DS/A/2012/002272 Vinay Batra Mumbai CIC/DS/A/2012/002457 S.K. Dash Mumbai

 

The Central Information Commission hears second appeal under the RTI act by issuing notice to both  RTI appellants and public authorities  to attend  video conference since 2009.

 

Abuse of chief vigilance officer - Lawyersclubindia
www.lawyersclubindia.com/.../Abuse-of-chief-vigilance-officer-80167.asp

https://twitter.com/revribhav

I WILL REQUEST THAT IF ANY MEMBER COULD UNDERSTAND WHAT HE MEANS THEN MAY SEND PM TO ME.

 

I COULD HAVE BEEN HAPPY TO HELP HIM IF HE HAD DESCRIBED ANY PROBLEM.

Two specific instances have been attached herewith.

On both the occsations the Central Public Information Officer/First appellate authority

of the insurance company were issued notice of Central Information Commission

to attend hearing of second appeal filed by SHRI GOPAL SONI RTI applicant through

 video conference from NIC Studio,Delhi.

The decision of the central information commission records the presence of company CPIO

not at Mumbai but at the Central Information Commission Delhi

The CPIO preferred enjoying tour by flight instead of saving public money,that is,attending the

prescribed mode of video conference from Mumbai.

 

THE RULE IS A TOUR IS SANCTIONED IN ADVANCE.

When there was no notice to be present in Delhi

How the CPIO preferred tour by flight?

sample format W.E.F. CALENDER YEAR 2010 to 2013 Shri Gopal Soni **(RTI appellant) Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd*** (respondent) Central Information Commission…………Bhikaji Cama Place,New Delhi.Phone Nos……… File No CIC/DSA/A/year/six digit. Date(d):month-date-year Notice of Hearing through Video Conferencing Appellant: **………………. Respondents:***…………….. Date of RTI:…………….. CPIO’s reply: ………………. Date of 1st Appeal……………… FAAO: ……………………… (Para one / two). Shri Gopal Soni,has filed Second Appeal/Complaint dated….(vide Diary….dated date/month/year before the Central Information Commission under section 19(3) of the Right to Information Act, 2005, relating to his/her RTI request dated date/ month/year. This appeal has been listed for hearing on date/month/year. / The hearing of the Second Appeal,dated……filed by ……….in the Central Information Commission under section…in the above matter will be held in the Court Room No… on the above address of the Commission at…on… (Para two/three). The Commission directs the CPIO and Appellate Authority to appear through Video Conferencing in person of may authorize an officer not below the rank of CPIO,who is well conversant with the matter to represent them. The Respondents are directed to give the name,designation and contact number of the person attending the hearing well in advance to the Commission before the date of hearing. (Para 3/4). The CPIO is also directed to inform the 3rd party if any to enable the 3rd party to defend or present his/her case before the Commission on the scheduled date of hearing. He/she may also file written submissions if any. In case assistance of any officer under section 5(4) of the RTI Act has been taken such person should also be notified and asked to appear before the Commission on the date and time mentioned above. (Para 4/5).The appellant is also given the opportunity to appear before the Commission in person or through his duly authorized representative. The appellant is directed to provide a copy of his second appeal to the CPIO and Appellate Authority,(if the same has not already been provided) within 3 days of receipt of the Notice. (Para 5). The CPIO/respondents is directed/may send his comments on the Appeal/ Complaint to the Commission by fax (No.011-26180532)or Email (tk.mohapatra@nic.in) within 3 days from the date of receipt of this notice. 6. The Appellant and the Respondents are also requested to intimate their telephone/ mobile numbers and E-mail address to the undersigned. All concerned are directed to attend the said hearing in person at the following address. Venue for the Appellant Venue for the CPIO Venue for the FAA NIC Video conference NIC,..Mumbai/Jaipur NIC,..Mumbai/Jaipur Studio..Ajmer.contact.. Contact… Contact… (T.K.Mohapatra),US/Dy. Secretary & Dy. Registrar Central Public Information Officer under RTI Act,2005 The/First Appellate Authority under RTI Act,2005 Shri Gopal Soni (Chief Manager)/ Dy G.M The New India Assurance Co. Ltd…Mumbai (Dy G.M./G.M.)The New India Assurance Co. Ltd…Mumbai C-231,Panchsheel Nagar,Ajmer-305004 File named P.K. Sahu enjoyed air travel 4.02 and 15.03 is attached.

 

A simple google search with File/order No. as per attachment is recommended.

There is case law of Lucknow Development Authority v. M.K. Gupta(1994) 4 SCC 243. Pronouncing compensation to the persons who were harassed due to malicious and oppressive exercise of power by the Public Servants, the apex Court of India directed that the said compensation shall be recovered from the officers proportionately from their salary.