Today I heard that the Government has approved for AMENDMENT IN HINDU MARRIAGE ACT/ SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT IN MUTUAL DIVORCE. I WANT TO KNOW WHEN THIS AMENDMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE?OR IS IT APPLICABLE SINCE TODAY? KINDLY INFORM
RAM SURAT (MANAGER) 10 June 2010
Today I heard that the Government has approved for AMENDMENT IN HINDU MARRIAGE ACT/ SPECIAL MARRIAGE ACT IN MUTUAL DIVORCE. I WANT TO KNOW WHEN THIS AMENDMENT WILL BE APPLICABLE?OR IS IT APPLICABLE SINCE TODAY? KINDLY INFORM
G. ARAVINTHAN (Legal Consultant / Solicitor) 10 June 2010
kindly go through this link..
You can also get the critic of our learned members
Arup (UNEMPLOYED) 12 June 2010
now the bill will be kept at both of the houses of parliament, if it passed at parliament, then it will be sent to president for her concent, after getting concent, the bill will be published at the official gaget of the govrnment. after publishing it will be act.///
THEREFORE, LONG TO RUN BEFORE YOU SLEEP.
===========
I BELIEVE THAT DIVORCE IS A PERSONAL LIBERTY AS THE MARRIAGE IS.
NOTHING CAN COMPLE ONE TO RESUME A MATRIMONY, WHICH IS ALREADY LOST.
MEDIA REPORTING THAT - 'IRRITRIVIABLE BREAKDOWN OF MARRIAGE' IS GOING TO BE ADD AS A GROUND FOR DIVORCE.
BUT I AM IN DOUBT OF IT. BECAUSE THE MAIN FOCUS OF THE NEWS IS ON, - SEC 13B IE MUTUAL DIVORCE, AND NOT IRRITRIVIABLE BREAKDOWN OF MARRIAGE.
HERE I WANT TO DRAW THE KIND ATTENTION OF THE MEMBERS THAT, -
SMT SHRUTI SHINDE, WHO IS DAUGHTER OF THE CABINET MINISTER AND TOP LEADER OF MAHARASHTRA CONGRESS, MR SUSHIL SHINDE IS BEING REFUSED BY THE COURT FOR MUTUAL DIVORCE - AFTER REFUSING MUTUAL DIVORCE BY HER HUSBAND.
ON THE OTHER WAY, AS THE HUSBAND OF SHRUTI, - REFUSED SHRUTI - FOR MUTUAL DIVORCE, THE COURT REFUSED SHRUTI FOR MUTUAL DIVORCE.
I AM AFFRAID / ANXIOUS THAT TO REACH THE BENIFIT TO THIS PARTY, THE PRESENT AMMENDMENT GOING TO BE MADE, AND NOT FOR A GENERAL CAUSE OF PEOPLE'S HARASMENT ON MATRIMONY. THEREFORE 'IRRITRIVIABLE BREAKDOWN OF MARRIAGE' MAY NOT BE ADD AS A GROUND FOR DIVORCE OR IF ADDED – IT ADD IN SUCH A MANNER THAT COMMON PEOPLE, HAVING NO HIGH APPROACH, CAN NOT GET –
‘JUST’ ON MATTER.
THAT'S WHY the TEXT ON THE MATTER IS ABSOLUTELY NECESSIRY AT THIS JUNCTURE.
mrgop (Owner) 12 June 2010
Is it applicable to sec 13B only?