In a compromise in matrimonial matter, certain admissions were made by the defendant/husband which he totally denied in his counter. Matter settled before court by way of MOC and decree passed.
Now the plaintiff/wife alleges that the admissions made by the defendant has given fresh rights and the plaintiff's right validated in accordance with law. Can she say so?
I suggested two points (1) plaintiff is estopped to allege as such. (2) If the plaintiff contravenes the compromise, then she himself makes the admissions of the defendant is invalid in law. (3) The plainitiff cannot misrepresent the decree.
Is this correct?
