The reply of petitioner was awaited on 19th march but not reply was given so order passed was as below
uma iyer 19 April 2016
The reply of petitioner was awaited on 19th march but not reply was given so order passed was as below
prabhakar advocate (advocate) 19 April 2016
As to avoid any future complication, Reply has to be filed on the date even though judge is not presiding but, in court order the fact comes that reply has been filed. The cost may be paid on that day or avoid it by saying that it would be paid only in the presence of the presiding judge.
uma iyer 20 April 2016
Thanks for your reply Mr.Prabhakar
Reply awaited from girl's father who has taken away the child.So if reply not given and judge not available then again postponement ? I am really worried