LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Siv (engineer)     06 June 2012

Charges are not frames since 4 years

Dear All,

 

Since 4 years the charges in the 498A case are not framed by the Magistrate Court because in 2008 the High Court granted stay of proceedings including appearence exemption of Accused A2 to A5. For Accused-A1 the High Court did not grant any relief.

 

In 2010 Accused-A1 filed discharge petition U/s 239 of CrPC but Magistrate Court did not discharge and matter is posted for Framing of Charge since then charges are not framed U/s 240 of CrPC.

 

Now what is the remedy available to the Accused-A1 in the Magistrate Court to avoid physical appearence.... I am facing problem in travelling to Hyderabad from Bangalore.

 

In high court matter is not coming up for disposal hence case proceedings are struc at this point.

 

In while filed petition U/s 125 of CrPC and made allegations such that the charge sheet allegations in 498A care not possible ot happen .... is there any way to bring these facts before the Magistrate for consideration and aquittal of Accused-A1 based of the affidavit of wife in CrPC-125 case referring the section 161 and 162 of CrPC.



Learning

 3 Replies

Adv.R.P.Chugh (Advocate/Legal Consultant (rpchughadvocatesupremecourt@hotmail.com))     06 June 2012

1. File a writ petition before the High Court on ground of violation of your right to life (speedy trial) because of this proctracted trial. 

2. As regards presence file for exemption u/s 205 (for charge framing you have to be there though)

3. Contest 125 on merits. 

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     06 June 2012

Yes,nothing but a gross violation of constitutional rights to speedy trial. Issue on my mind is, in such case the Court should compensate the victims of this precious constitutionsl rights.

GOYAL PRADEEP (advocate)     06 June 2012

RESP SIR,

A SIMILAR SITUATION.-.IT IS ALLEGED BY THE COMPLAINANT THAT TRESSPASSING IS DONE BY THE  NEIGHBOUR.WHO FILED A PROTEST APPLICATION ABOUT>A YR BACK.BUT THE COMPLAINANT WAS GIVEN>A YR TO FILE THE REPLY WITHOUT ANY REASON.DATE OF HEARING WERE DEFFERED EVERY 2-3 MONTHS.NOW REPLIED AFTER 15 MONTHS.WHO IS RESPONSIBLE.?CAN WE APPROACH SOME AUTHORITY FOR THE SAME.?PL GUIDE.

THANKS & REGARDS.

PS.-SORRY IF WRONG COLUMN HAS BEEN USED.I FEEL SO.PL EXCUSE.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register