LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

DSR (Officer)     24 May 2011

Cheque Signature

Please kindly suggest any thoughts /ideas about bank procedure/process.

What Happened :
January 2011 : Given a check to A company in the amount of Rs 55000.
March 2011 : Changed my singature in my savings bank account with a private bank.
April 2011 : Away from/out of town on business purpose and back by end of month.
May 2011 : Got a case notice from A company that check bounced .

Check that was given to A Company deposited in April 1st week , had my old signature and bank rejected the check by saying that signature was not matching when A Company deposited in April 2011.
Went to bank and enquired why such check was rejected though sufficent funds were available in
account to pass the instrument.

Bank's version was that they would not pass old signature check, when the new signature was updated the old signaute gets deleted ( Does bank really do that ?) and it's upto the customer responsibility to make necessary measures not to provide check with old signatures and collect them or what ever.

Questions :
1) Is not bank's supposed to have both signatures in their system for a while and check them
before rejecting the check.
2) I debated with manager that Bank regulation's does not allow the bank to delete old signatures
from the system. ( I explained a scenario as below ) or any record as such either from system
or paper records for 10 years. He rejected my claim that they bank can delete signatures.

+++++
If the customer having a current signature ( signA) changes the signature twice with in a time span
of one month on 1st of month ( SignB) and 30th end of month ( SignC) for suppose  assumption.
Then complains that the check was mis-used with SignA after 35th day. Bank version was that they will
check with signature change forms to tally them. My version was how do you track if the customer
issue is a real issue when a check was mis-used with SignA and the statement reflects with in the next month and the complaint is genuine, what measure bank should take care.


This A Company is trying to terminate contract with me and looking for reasons and I have sent a notice back with registered letter , that it was not intentional and the check was given way back in January 2011. Let 's see what they would say.

 



 



Learning

 4 Replies

DEFENSE ADVOCATE.-firmaction@g (POWER OF DEFENSE IS IMMENSE )     24 May 2011

once the signatures are changed old signatures have no relevance.

DSR (Officer)     24 May 2011

Good to know that the old singature had no relevance.
 Does the bank had to keep the copies of the old signature record in their electronic system? If not how can the bank prove them selves in the case where the explained scenario above.

Was not there any bank/rbi regulations related to that ? 

As per https://fiuindia.gov.in which seems , there is something that banks should keep old singatures in electronic form , otherwise it could be a mess for them, as I think so.

Any titbits would be helpful.

Arun Shankar (Director)     24 May 2011

Point 1: As there was sufficient funds in your account, lawyer's notice u/s 138 is untenable; bad in law.

Point 2: Your client is legally tendering you a second chance to pay the amount within 15 days, through the lawyer's notice. So you can make use of the same and clear your debt.

DSR (Officer)     26 May 2011

Thank you for information. Clearing it with party.

Given the above scenario, I think Bank should store signatures in their system. Any ideas on this from anyone.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register