False 498a,304b, quashing?

Dear Kumar,

As per the above post of Mr. Ashish only cross examination is sufficient to tear the case.... may be it is possible. You may try that option with appropriate priority. But better to be ready with your own evidecne to support your calims those may help when nedded else no one can hep at that stage. If your opposite side witnesses are smarter than your lawyer or if your lawyer coluds with opposite side then.....?

Hope evidecne has somevalue in court of law. And always people say evidecne is required to win the case. I may not be the expert to give complete information but clearly can say that if you have evidecne in support of your version, that you may need to secure before it destroys, we do not know what happens in cross and if any requirement of any evidence/document required at that stage and if will destroy by that time, need proper effort from your side.

Finally if you produce your evidecne in support of your case and your version then the Hon'ble Court has to say that your side material is invalid on relevant gorunds.... at that time Hon'ble Court see your side material to protect innocents, if applicable.....

Dear Kumar,

If you could say in the High Court with sufficient material that the wife's sucide is not possible to happen with dowry harassment in any given circumstances then you can approach High Court but is it possible.... I believe NO? If answer is no then you can not get anything from High Court.

If you say YES, then share your points to coment on those points/grounds ....

A smart lawyer is smarter than the smartest witness and knows just how to impeach his credit.

I agree with you that truth could win hence smarter lawyer could win against the Smartest false witness.

A smart lawyer can impeach the credit of even the true witnesses.

Evidences:

1)  They are complaining that we are demanding extra dowry of 10 lakhs (which is false), and me and my family bore grudge against my wife on 05-Jan-2012 and necked the decease person from my house, and she informed to her father and he took back to his native.

-- But on 04 -Jan- 2012 she went to my in-laws house as a part of festival, i had a conversation with my wife very harmoniously on 05-jan-2012 10.45 AM. I have clear recordings. And also i am in office in Chennai at that time 05-jan-2012 not in my native place. my wife is in my in-laws house at that time. How can we necked her from my house as we are at different places at that exact time of incidence. I am in my office and she is in my in-laws house and my father and mother are in my native @3 different places. Is CDR with tower details useful to prove that we are not at that place when the incident took place?

2) I had so many such recordings to prove my innocence, which are against their allegations.
  For these i need CDR and (or) tower details. How can i get those documents using Crpc 91 sec with out
my lawyer concerned?  what is the procedure to apply now? Trail is not yet started. Please help me to get those crucial documents in advance as it is time sensitive (tower data).

And i also want to know how strong my evidences to fight back in my case? Please help me!

Thanks

Kumar
 

Why do you want to venture to get those documents without the help of your lawyer? Prudence requires that legal assistance should be indispensable at every stage of the case. Consult with your lawyer regarding every aspect of the case.