there are always two sides not one as you are projecting still contest in court it is easy to win anu cheque case.

Dear Ali Asghar

Firstly you can send an application to SSP/Commissioner of police  regarding this matter and try to registered a case against the person and police inspector if the SSP?commissioner is not ready to take any action then file a criminal complaint against them, if he file a criminal complint against you u/s 138 NI act then you can take defence on this ground

feel free to call me on 919953809956

Once you have given cheque than afterwards such tactics do not work. There is no smoke without fire, there must be some dues which the party used tactics to take it out from you.

Yes if you can show no dues or no relations and than cheque is taken than and than only you wlll be heard.

Even if somebody has dues, there is due process of law to extract the dues lawfully. Does pending of dues allow the other party to use violent force and threats to extract a cheque in its favour? It is another matter whether he will be able to prove that under duress of unlawful force and threats he has been forced to issue a cheque. I think Nadeem Quereshi has advised him to report to SSP keeping this in mind.

But dear sir it will defficult to prove than cheque was given under distress since the persons must have brought cheque book from home , written and signed. All these acts can not be forced.

Incidentally the Honble SC has given stringent directions for issue and tenure of NBW in criminal cases on 9th Sep 2011. Pl send your email ID to me at my email ID - firmaction at gmail for the copy of the original judgment which I will forward with pleasure.

Dear friends

there is no provision in eyes of law that if a cheque issued in therethened cituation then the issuerer always liable for that. Hon'ble Court also see the facts and circumastances.

But how you will prove that that cheque was taken by threatening. No records are there and none can be produced.

Dear JSDN

for this purpose all formalities are required to prove thAT WE ARE HERE WITH BONAFIDE INTENTION

cout needs evidence, heresay not allowed.