Mohammed Qureshi 30 January 2020
Advocate Suneel Moudgil (Advocate) 30 January 2020
1. i didn't undestand the below phrase
"The judge asked if the Inquiry was done In answer to this, the men went to their homes and said that no inquiries were made."
2. the accused were punished with Rs. 1000/- fine and six months imprisonment, whats impossible in it? if you are not satisfied file an appeal
The cardinal principle of criminal jurisprudence is that the guilt of the accused with respect to the charges levelled need to be proved by prosecution beyond all reasonable doubt, to award punishment by the court.
In the given case the prosecution has successfully proved the charge of Sec.498A only beyond all reasonable doubt, hence the court awarded punishment.However, as prosecution has miserably failed to prove other charges levelled, beyond all reasonabe doubt, the benefit of doubt shall be extened to accused and results in acquittal.
If you are aggreived by Court Judgement perfer an appeal before expiry of statutory time.
Regatrds
Balachander Reddy
Advocate
9959850723
Rupin Dhama 31 January 2020
manish (Advocate) 31 January 2020
P. Venu (Advocate) 01 February 2020
Yes, the facts as posted lacks clarity. Please post simple facts.
Dr J C Vashista (Advocate) 03 February 2020
Incomplete facts posted can not lead to form proper opinion and oblige.
What is the advise of your lawyer contesting the case(s) since 2011 ? Follow it.
If you need a second opinion it is advisable to consult another local prudent lawyer for appreciation of facts/ documents, and professional guidance .