LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

ruchikaz (hr)     31 August 2015

Husband resinged job after maintenance order

interim - maintenance order has been passed by lower court and just after few days of order husband has resigned from job . The arrears have been pending from last 1 year and on the date of payment they are requesting for modification of nterim-maintenance order as the husband is jobless as he is living outside india and was working there only.

will this effect interim - maintenance case/order ?

what shall i do now ?

 



Learning

 4 Replies

saravanan s (legal advisor)     01 September 2015

https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Liability-of-unemployed-husband-to-pay-maintenance-to-wife-126380.asp#.VeSdmCVViko

SAINATH DEVALLA (LEGAL CONSULTANT)     01 September 2015

 

'Husband should pay maintenance even if he is jobless'

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
MADURAI BENCH  OF MADRAS HIGH COURT

A man, though jobless, should pay maintenance to his wife as ordered by court in divorce case, Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court has ruled.

Justice G Rajasuriya said the husband cannot claim that he was poor, in order to dodge his responsibility of providing monthly maintenance to his wife.

“A husband has to take care of his wife somehow or other even if he is jobless,” the Judge.

He was dismissing a civil revision petition filed by the man challenging the March 3 last order of family court, before which the couple have filed divorce petition, directing him to pay Rs. 2,000 as interim maintenance.

The Judge also rejected a petition by the woman seeking enhancement of the interim maintenance to Rs.7,000.

The man had pleaded that he did not have the source to pay the maintenance ordered by the lower court.

His wife said the maintenance ordered by the court was too low.

In his order, the Judge said: “A hale and healthy man is expected to work to maintain himself and his dependants. He has to maintain his wife who is incapable of maintaining herself. Somehow or other husband should maintain.” Rejecting the prayer for enhancing the maintenance amount of Rs. 2,000 granted by the lower court, he said the plea was justifiable if there was clinching evidence to prove that the husband was well off.

The petitioner did not produce any such evidence to prove that her husband had enough money, he observed and confirmed the maintenance amount granted by the lower court.

Besides, the Judge also directed the man to provide Rs. 3,000 to his wife for paying the cost of litigation.

The Judge directed the family court to dispose the divorce petition, pending since 2007, in three months.

 

amaresh   01 September 2015

its a biased judgements . biased towards a women...

T. Kalaiselvan, Advocate (Advocate)     08 September 2015

A good information posted by learned advocate Mr.Sainath Devalla. Hope this answers the author's query.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register