LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

PRAKASH (MANAGER)     07 May 2012

Legal threat of supreme court

Now a days one thing is very famous...its PIL .. before few days SC ordered  upon PIL that motor vehicle act no 100.. no cars will take security of windows glasses , it means that not use of black film on windshield or windows that is becomes in a crime, so its only for causes of CRIME (RAPES,DCOIT,KIDNAPPINGS etc..) and i ask one thing from JUSTICES those are given these kiddish type of order,

1 what about personal security 

2 what about vehicles security

3 what about human threatning 

4 what about Ultra Violet Rays ( indian continent have more U/V)

5 Human Rights clauses ( human will uses his/her likes )

so what justice want to changes is the crime is onle cause of black films or some thing wrong, how many crime will done in car they have black film on windows,

This is unlaw full type of order so i want to ask that is i can appeal against these unlaw full or kiddish type of order please suggest me i m also go to court and ask these all

 

Prakash Jugnake

Research Scholar

Robotics automation in artificial intelligence



Learning

 1 Replies

Democratic Indian (n/a)     07 May 2012

I agree that giving crime as reason for banning tinted films, the judgment appears kiddish. What is happening to the Liberty guaranteed to all of us under Article 21 of the Constitution of India? What is the case number of this judgment so that it can be read at Supreme Court website?


But before appealing against this judgment it will be prudent to read it completely and also understand the scientific reason behind putting a limit on the percentage of light transfer through windshields put in the Motor Vehicles Act. Too much dark glasses or films may cause poor visibility leading to accidents etc.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register