Originally posted by : ABHISHEK B | ||
my contention is not that she is appealing against the Lower Court order which denied any monthly interim maintenance. Instead what I want to know from the learned friends here is, if she even got litigation cost instead of the monthly maintenance, isint it her duty to mention the same when filing her Appeal ? Why should one suppress this fact that Lower Court while rejecting her monthly maintenance, was pleased to grant litigation cost which she indeed accepted but prefers keeping quite hoping to squeeze out more. |
You eat your head of your advocate. He is the right person to address your bekaarness.