Dear learned advocates, first my salute to you all.
The sub registrar though is inclined to release the document, he is cautioning me that I may have issues later as it may not come in EC. I find with my little knowledge, the new doument read along with previous deeds as refrenced technically correct to have clarity on the plot that has been conveyed. Please go through the following and advice. Thanks
I recently purchased a plot from a seller. The seller provided both the original document and a rectified deed. The rectified deed clearly specifies the plot number, survey number, CMDA layout approval, and detailed boundaries.
In the new purchase deed, the schedule mentions a new survey number (210/51) and new current patta number (22977),which was obtained through the patta issued to the seller a few months ago. The boundaries, and total area remain consistent with the details in the original document. However, the old survey number (210/4) is not mentioned in the new deed. Both the original document and the rectified deed are referenced as previous linked documents.
Details from the previous document (Schedule B):
-
Plot Number: 47 in "SASTRI NAGAR"
-
Survey Number: 210/4
-
Location: No. 82, Varadharajapuram Village, Sriperumbudur Taluk, Chengleput District
-
Extent: 2170 square feet
Exact Measurements:
-
East to West (Northern side): 27 feet
-
East to West (Southern side): 37 feet
-
North to South (Eastern side): 50 feet
-
North to South (Western side): 60 feet
Boundaries:
-
North: 30 feet Road
-
South: Plot No. 48
-
East: 30 feet Road
-
West: Plot No. 46
In the new purchase deed, all these measurements and boundaries are accurately reflected, except that the old survey number (210/4) is replaced by the new survey number (210/51) and includes the updated patta number (22977).
