Nomination Before Marriage

The same query was posted before and already, suggestions have been offered.

Nominations made for life insurance and provident fund automatically lapse on marriage of the person. After marriage only wife can be nominee.

Nomination is different from succession.  The authorities are discharged from their liability by paying to the nominee.  The legal heirs should approach through court for their legitimate share as apparent legal heirs.  Because some one is nominated, he can absolutely own the proceeds of deceased but subject to such claims from Class I legal heirs, and they represent collective interest and can not claim ownership.   Contact a local advocate, instead of posting the same query again and again, without taking any further action, as there is limitation period for every such step.

Nomination is different from succession. Still there are laws as to who can be nominated and who cannot. The testator is not free to nominate anyone as likes. A nominee is not a mere administrator.

@ Dr. MPS Ramani,

With reference to your reply, "Nominations made for life insurance and provident fund automatically lapse on marriage of the person. After marriage only wife can be nominee, " probably, you have the need to refresh your knowledge about nomination before and after marriage in the case of LIC and PF.

@ Jigyasu

I may be outdated. I shall be thankful if you enlighten me.

Originally posted by : Dr. MPS RAMANI Ph.D.[Tech]
	@ Jigyasu I may be outdated. I shall be thankful if you enlighten me.

@ Dr. MPS Ramani,

Nice, probably you want to test my knowledge! OK. Please rest assured, I do not touch any query or reply thereto unless I am sure about the law/ Ruling position pertaining to that.

Since I treat the query of the querist as a vague having doubt about problem having any reality, instead of providing answer to her academic query, I have replied your query through PM. Please check that.

I was sincere and meant what I wrote. I came across this in the course of helping a young relative, who was widowed soon after marriage. I said I may be outdated because the incident happened years back, but not as far back as 1938. If I have to reply now I will have to read your PM and may be I will have to do research.

@ Dr. MPS Ramani,

I have not asked you to go through any document pertaining to the year 1938, but the completely substituted provision as amended by the latest document of 2015.. So, the purpose of your message is not understood. The message was sent only in response to your request for updating you, not unduly at my own.

May be you are too busy not to have found a time to read my very short message worth readable within 5 to 10 seconds, as sent two days back. Anyway, you are at liberty to read or not and respond or not my message, dated 01.012.2017.

A very good  and decent way of dealing with disputed replies.  Sending PMs and not showing arrogance and attitude in posts reflects respect towards others.  Congratulations for both, in attempts to finding out guidance for genuine queries in a decent and befitting manner as experts in a good forum.

@ G L N Prasad,

Thank you very much for appreciation of my way of dealing with the disputed replies.

This fellow nick named "JIGYASU" claims himself as a "Legal Analyst"
For his various posts, it seems that he is here only to Criticise & Ridicule other expert participants.  
This fellow nick named "JIGYASU" never provides any answers to any queriest and only keeps on twisting his perverted words.  
BEWARE OF HIS FRUSTRATION & NEFARIOUS HABIT.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal

A member comes to the forum only for receiving guidance, and by the time he approaches the forrum, most of them might have got a fair idea and confused on further action.  Member who posts the queries want precise, upto the point guidance and ignores other not relevant comments.  Experts rarely visit the forum and reply, but those who are having knowledge may provide guidance with such citations, that may be helpful.  Forum is not ultimate and it is the local Advocate that has to be take care of his clients.  Litigants that deal with Advocates from moffusil and feel that their Advocate is not well acquainted mostly visit the forum.  At the end it is valuable  guidance that matters and not the person behind..  Those who provide guidance for others are always valuable and most important as their intentions to help members through forum  deserves appreciation.   There is no question of raising personal issues and arguments other than the subject and issues as this forum is decent with professionals.

@ Shri GLN Prasad,

Well pointed out by you. But when in case of some fake experts and their touts someone points out to them about their faulty & misleading advice with their much hyped about their half baked knowledge or infested with ego, they often feel jealousy against other knowledgeable persons, who dared to alert the querist about wrong and misleading advice. So, instead of making review of their own knowledge, they often talk in the language & tone of the fellow, like Mr. Hemant Agarwal.

The irony is, Mr. Hemant Agarwal has not tried to demonstrate his knbowledge to prove me wrong by rendering a law based advice for the querist, if any, but has specially appeared on the forum just to criticize me in person. 

Instead of appearing specifcially to raise false alrm, Mr. Hemant Agarwal should better have understoof that if a person can question about the wrong pereptions, assumptions or presumptions of some one else, he often knows more than the person whose wrong advice is questioned. Even in this case, Mr. Hemant Agarwal could better have justified himself by giving appropriate advice to the querist or scuttling down my views duly supported by his legal knowledge, rather than raising a false alarm without any of his contribution as per the provisions of law. THAT CLEARLY REVEALS ABIOUT HIS DELIBERATE INTENTION TO TARNISH MY IMAGE. So, it is clear that he is bogged down with frustration due to his own half baked knowledge, as he never came forward with appropriate section of some relevant law when questioned about his presumption about a nominee to be merely a trustee of the legal heirs. So, his present post is merely a case of his jealousy against me, being superior to his knowledge on property laws.

SO, YOU CAN VERY WELL JUDGE, WHO IS FRUSTRATED OR INFESTED WITH NEFARIOUS HABIT, Mr. Hemant Agarwal or Mr. Jigyasu (me)?