Rajesh 26 November 2017
Vijay Raj Mahajan (Advocate) 26 November 2017
KISHAN DUTT KALASKAR (Advocate) 26 November 2017
Only when substantial question of law arises then only SLP will be admitted. Finding out substantial question of law depends upon the intelligence of the advocate. Brief facts may be sent to me to find out whether there is any such question because you are saying it was on the ground of non-consumation of marriage. The word non-consumation appears not definded in any legislation. And it is a secret act which cannot be concluded in positive by a Court. Let us think positevely.
Draft petition/legal notice will be prepared by me on payment of my professional nominal fees, you may approach me with copies of further details.
Sycorax Juris 26 November 2017
Unless the brief is posted, it will be like a preditions only.
N.K.Assumi (Advocate) 26 November 2017
Interference with the concurrent findings of fact may be justified if any of the following test is satisfied, namely;-
1.Finding is perverse
2.Material irregularities affecting the findings
3.The court feels that Justice has failed,
4.Findings are likely to result in unduly excessive hardships
5.Ignoring doubtful documentary evidence
6.Fraud on the court
Rajesh 26 November 2017