WHO ARE THE MAIN ACCUSED FOR CORRUPTION IN JUDICIARY

Mr. Mahendra,

Advocates are neither the managers nor the agents of the judges. Most of the corrupt people are govt., employees, some are fair.

If the judges are so fair they couldn't have accepted the moeny, they could have rejected it, why they accept it from directly from the accused then how come advocates will play the role.

I strongly oppose your words ADVOCATES WHO PROPOSES AND GIVES MONEY TO JUDGES.

My question is who made them to propose. Now days clients trend is that even they ready to give the money to the judges but not the fees of the advocates. They also try to influence the judges.

IN my opinion the main accused  in juidiciary for corruption is a person himself who made to pay the bribe to him.

WHAT I FEEL MR MAHENDRA,  THE MAIN ACCUSED FOR CORRUPTION IN JUDICIARY, IS THE JUDGES ITSELF.  IT IS NOT THE PRACTISING ADVOCATES. THEY ARE BUSINESSMAN, DOING THEIR BUSINESS.

JUDGES ARE GOVT EMPLOYEE. THEY ARE BOUND TO GIVE JUST

GENERALLY, PEOPLE THINK THAT JUDGES HAVE POWER TO GIVE JUST, THEREFORE THIS IS THERE DISCREATIONARY POWER. BUT IT IS NOT THAT. EVERY POWER GIVEN WITH LIABILITIES. JUDGES BEARS THE LIABILITY OF DOING 'JUST'.

---   IT IS NOT SALEABLE.

GENERALLY, PEOPLE THINK THAT JUDGES HAVE POWER TO GIVE JUST, THEREFORE THIS IS THERE DISCREATIONARY POWER.

BUT IT IS NOT THAT.

EVERY POWER GIVEN WITH LIABILITIES.

JUDGES BEARS THAT LIABILITY OF DOING 'JUST'.

---   IT IS NOT SALEABLE.

Administrative personnel encouragement  at the instance of  litigants.

T.R. Ganesan 

MR GANESAN, UNABLE TO FOLLOW YOU, LITTLE MORE EPLANATION REQUIRED.

Plz. go thro' the following speech and asertion of Ex CJI K G Balakrishnan

“The lawyers have an affirmative whistle-blowing obligation to report other lawyers violating rules of ethics.” said Hon’ble Shree.  K.G. Balakrishnan, Chief Justice of India in the address at the National Seminar of the Bar Council of India at Cuttack on 14.4.2007. On 26^th November 2007 in an address to the nation on the “State of Administration of Justice” on the occasion of Law Day the Chief Justice Shree. K.G. Balakrishnan again observed “Corruption in the judiciary has become a highly talked about issue in recent times. A single judicial scandal can shake the confidence of the public in the whole judicial system. Corruption deserves to be curbed with an iron fist, whenever it is detected and ascertained beyond doubt. It is said that for every corrupt judge, there exist the inevitable corruptors in the form of lawyers, litigants, trustees and receivers, ministerial staff and intermediate agents or touts. Most are officers of the court and are bound by the same ethical and moral standards as judges. Thus, they have an affirmative whistle-blowing function to report incidents of others violating rules of ethics. It is the duty of lawyers to uphold rule of law and it is with the help of the members of the legal profession that a sense of security can be inculcated in the mind of the common man.”

Mr. Mahendra Titareji

Hope u would have got the answer.

Dear Arupji,

Ref. 11 July,2010 requirement of Explanation.

Litigants those who wanted to purchase  justice are moderately rich.  It  is not possible without public servant(s) to bridge the gap for giver<>taker.  Law enforcement agencies are the first correpted public servants.The correption exists everywhere  and on many forms. During the period of elections from and for electing Executive Body of Societies to Parliment correption is not ruled out. 

The recent Adarsh CHS, Coloba, Mumbai all the Ministers, Bureaucrats law makers/law breakers are corrept.  People lost faith and confidence in the Administration. Now the time is ripe to wipe out this menacec from the public administration.  I firm opinion is that the freedom to do any thing is too much.  There should be another Emergency .

T.R. Ganesan   

Mr.Arup is  not correct. Advocates are the  route cause for the curruption in Judiciary.  To satisfy big clients,   Litigent Politicians  Advocates  are forgetting  their moral  ethics and  performing their  practical  duty  which was not  part of  Law.  Once  Advocates are in good books of politicians  they  may be benefitted in future.

Clients also  part  to it.   To get  favourable  dates, orders,  judgements or directions from the court  support and  pay  through advocates.  In fact Advocates advise  to it.

The statements of  Big  personalities  are  only  for the  idiot public  not for them.   It is also excellent  to hear from their  mouth such   mantras and we believe that  they told fact.

The curruption cannot be  eradicated  in any field unless  the  responsible  citizens, officials  raise their  voice against  to it.   The voice  not  in  a form of   SOUND  it should be in a form of   implementation / application.

the judges have not landed from heaven and advocates have risen from monkeys

they are product of same society

who selects judges ?

corrupt so if the processs is hot handled by honest how can the product be honest

do not allow IAS to sit every where from atomic energy to solar energy