Workman defective inquiry

firs tof all this forum is not apokes person of any company so cannot reply "Why workman was given first opportunity for.................."

vague query

1. what was the inquiry
2. why was the inquiry
3. how was the inquiry
4. what was outcome of was the inquiry
5. what order was passed based on the inquiry
6. who is challnaging the inquiry
7. why challnaging the inquiry
8. where challnageing the inquiry

First, if the enquiry is proceeding ex-parte, then where is the question of workman's evidence? An ex-parte enquiry takes place only when the workman is not participating in the enquiry. 

Please frame your questions properly in order to get better advice. 

First of all I feel sorry if I may not be able to frame question properly Let me try again

Labour Court has set aside defective exparte domestic inquiry and adjourned the case for workman evidence.

Generaly management is given opportunity for fresh evidence when inquiry is proved defective and is set aside.

Now my question is why labour court gave first  chance to workman.

"Now my question is why labour court gave first chance to workman."

once again you are making /assuming this forum as spokesperson of the labour court.