Do lawyers have the right to boycott courts? |
|
Yes | 23 % |
No | 69 % |
Can't say | 8 % |
Total Votes Cast : 52 | |
Submitted By - Guest | Read Comments |
Posted by A. A. JOSE |
03/11/2008 13:01:35 |
ABSOLUTELY NO. | |
Posted by yamini |
14/03/2008 13:53:18 |
one day lawyer's boycott will spoil that day total work of judicial officers and the people who came to court to seek judicial help. in my view it is better to over work inplace of boycott | |
Posted by yamini |
14/03/2008 13:48:01 |
one day lawyer's boycott will spoil that day total work of judicial officers and the people who came to court to seek judicial help. in my view it is better to over work inplace of boycott | |
Posted by Arihant Jain |
14/03/2008 12:06:20 |
As per the professional ethics and code of conduct prescribed for the lawyers, lawyers are supposed to be first court members to maintain the dignity and prestige of Hon'ble courts. | |
Posted by R. Brizmohan Singh |
13/03/2008 22:53:23 |
The relationship between a client and his lawyer is purely contractual, that contract controlled by a Legislation, Advocates Act and the Bar Council. Having taken fee and not appearing in the court may amount to a misconduct. So long the matter is not disposed off exparte, nothing may happen and it is only otherwise that puts the Advocate into a soup. The only way is to handover the fee and the brief to the client well in advance if an advocate wishes to bear allegiance to the Group which called for boycott. Just imagine, if the matter is decided and further higher remedies are too confined. The client is doomed for ever after having all the fee. | |
Posted by sharath |
13/03/2008 14:17:36 |
it depends on the situvation | |
Posted by Rajendran Nallusamy |
13/03/2008 13:30:25 |
Lawyers certainly have the right to boycott courts when there situation warrants. But this should be used sparingly. | |