Is Specialization in legal practise necessary ? |
|
| Yes | 82 % |
 |
|
| No | 18 % |
|
|
|
| Can't Say | 1 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 320 | |
| Submitted By - Guest | Read Comments |
| Posted by A. A. JOSE |
03/11/2008 12:36:13 |
| I FEEL THAT TODAY'S WORLD DEMANDS MULTI-SKILLS RATHER THAN SPECIALIZATION. THEREFORE, THIS CONCEPT IS VERY MUCH RELEVANT FOR LAWYERS ALSO. ONE SHOULD BE ABLE TO HANDLE ANY LEGAL MATTER. SENIOR COUNSEL IN THE APEX COURT TAKES UP ALL KINDS OF MATTERS AND HANDLES THEM EFFECTIVELY. MOST OF THE JUDGES OF HIGHER JUDICIARY ALSO DEAL WITH ANY KIND OF MATTERS WITHOUT SPECILISATION ON A SINGLE BRANCH OF LAW. THIS SHOULD BE IDEAL WAY FOR LAWYERS TODAY. | |
| Posted by SWATI ATRIWAL |
29/07/2008 01:27:18 |
| it is not necessary like civiland criminal lawyer can be same as judges also performs such tasks simultaneosly | |
| Posted by SRIPRAKASH BHATTACHARYA |
28/07/2008 21:48:31 |
| ONE SHOULD HAVE A LOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL MIND. IT DOES NOT COME EVEN A PERSON STUDIES LAW. BY STUDYING LAW A PERSON COMES ACROSS THE COUR PROCEDURES AND ACTS AND RULES. HOWEVER IF A PERSON THOUGH NOT BEING LAWYEAR HAS THE QUALITY AS SAID IN THE FIRST FEW LINES, CAN BECOME A GGOD LAWYEAR. THIS IS LIKE THAT THE BEST ARBITRATORS ARE NOT LAWYEARS. THEY ARE PEOPLE FROM THE DISCIPLINES OF HISTORY, ENGINEERING AND ECONOMICS ETC. I REPEAT AGAIN, IT IS THE LOGICAL AND ANALYTICAL MIND WHICH MATTERS. Sriprakash Bhattacharya | |
| Posted by Vikram Chandra |
28/07/2008 19:03:06 |
| Unless one is specialized or perfect in the particular subject by way or regular practice, it can be assumed that the advise is not perfect. However, in some circumstances there is only common sense which is required to settle the issue irrespective of the role of the legality involved, whereas some issues involve deep knowledge of relevancy in the subject. Thus as far as the later part is concerned the specilization is required in practice. Thus I hope as far as specilization is concerned I am recollecting a famous saying is ...... 'PRACTICE MAKE A MAN PERFECT'. regards, vikram. | |
| Posted by I.S.Bhonde |
28/07/2008 12:51:36 |
| It's needed.Which saves lot of time and lower the chances of misguidance.It also gives you lot of confidance in matter. | |
| Posted by Chandan Garg |
28/07/2008 10:22:04 |
| practice is not neccasary.. but otherwise it is helpfull | |
| Posted by mathurpramodnarain |
27/07/2008 19:51:26 |
| specialization in legal practice is necesary still knowledge of maximum feilds is also necessary and practice in miscellaneous is necessary | |
| Posted by Kiran Kumar |
27/07/2008 18:42:33 |
| what I believe having in depth knowledge in one particular field is necessary. A specialised lawyer with a appropriate knowledge in the connected laws can deliver better services to a client. | |
| Posted by sanket shah |
27/07/2008 14:20:57 |
| its really needed. interpretation requires lot exoertisatin and even application of different laws in same case requires expertisation. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
26/07/2008 20:15:50 |
| Because of requirement of complete knowlege in study of case | |
| Posted by rajvinder |
26/07/2008 18:53:10 |
| yes it is necessary .u can be a master of a subject and can earn a good reputation | |
| Posted by nnnnnn |
26/07/2008 15:12:01 |
| it is necessary........ | |
| Posted by Kapil |
26/07/2008 09:47:07 |
| It is not necessary, as an Advocate (Professional Person)one should always be ready from all aspects. | |
| Posted by sanman ayachit |
25/07/2008 21:14:46 |
| it must because u can concentrate on particular div. it helps 2 u & others | |
| Posted by ca.bhupendrashah |
24/07/2008 22:44:37 |
| NObody can even physically reach to perform all tasks. | |
| Posted by ca.bhupendrashah |
24/07/2008 22:42:41 |
| many guys do any work like jack of all! | |
| Posted by Sanjay Agarwal |
23/07/2008 22:01:36 |
| carry up | |
| Posted by s.sivakumar |
22/07/2008 21:50:35 |
| yes there should be specialization in legal practise | |
| Posted by KKS.KRISHNARAJ |
22/07/2008 21:34:52 |
| yes | |
| Posted by KISHAN PRATAP SINGH DEORA |
22/07/2008 15:46:19 |
| with the growin era specialization is a necessity | |
| Posted by arun anto paranilam |
21/07/2008 16:07:34 |
| Because it applies to the look and corner of subject | |
| Posted by Naveen Kumar |
21/07/2008 13:09:31 |
| I law is very wide subject and everyone who have knowledge of law must knowledge of every field of law so I don't think there should be specialization in one field. | |
| Posted by Sarvesh Kumar Sharma Advocate |
20/07/2008 21:56:09 |
| ******speclization is not recomended by any type of degree,or practicing certificate in law education so what ever is not permited is prohibited. | |
| Posted by sukumar |
20/07/2008 15:37:54 |
| yes specilisation in some areas is necessary for good practice. | |
| Posted by RAM DEO KAKRA |
19/07/2008 23:03:49 |
| spesi gives better response and confidence | |
| Posted by vinod bansal |
19/07/2008 21:47:57 |
| Its better for a lawyer to choose a category as civil ,criminal or taxation | |
| Posted by Ambika.S |
18/07/2008 17:38:40 |
| each branch of law is wide and therefore it is required to practise in particular branch so that the legal practitioner will have comand over the subject. | |
| Posted by Kadali RK Rao |
18/07/2008 16:37:59 |
| Unlike Human Doctors, Specialization in legal practise is not necessary. Because, Judge would deliver the judgment based on the facts & records, evidence and whereas Specialist Doctor is solely responsible for treatment given to the patient | |
| Posted by Preeti |
18/07/2008 16:32:15 |
| Specialization by degree is not required. Specialization by practice can be advisable but certainly not NECESSARY. | |
| Posted by palapati.madhavi |
17/07/2008 22:14:00 |
| yes legal field must have specialization for practical knowleged | |
| Posted by mohammad aarif khan silawat |
17/07/2008 21:33:07 |
| practice make perfact | |
| Posted by RADHA PYARI SRIPADA |
17/07/2008 13:57:44 |
| one may be a jack of all trades to cater to the needs of all clients but should be a master of one / few for attaining recognition and self satisfaction. | |
| Posted by SUNDEEP |
17/07/2008 13:38:02 |
| no comment | |
| Posted by Prashanth N |
17/07/2008 10:55:52 |
| Specialization is not necessary, we as a lawyer should b able to resolve all kinds of disputes. Henceforth it is our duty to provide justice to the needy not depending upon the specialization. | |
| Posted by Charan Kedar.C. |
17/07/2008 09:45:28 |
| yes coz when practising then only individual will be up to the expected mark | |
| Posted by saurabh arora |
16/07/2008 18:51:40 |
| practise makes a man perfect | |
| Posted by Rohit sakalley |
16/07/2008 18:29:47 |
| specializaton shows your knowledge for your perticular field that u chosen | |
| Posted by SANJAY DIXIT |
16/07/2008 17:40:19 |
| Yes. The present time is for the specialists but in my views in the legal profession one should has the basic knowledge in all the relevant fields apart from his specialised field. | |
| Posted by nilotpal mukherjee |
16/07/2008 16:31:31 |
| for me,legal profession is the most prestigious profession in this world,we serve our country through our own view,we have the rights to save a person who is in distress,we can utilise totally,what we can study,a person-s life is depending on us,as how we handle the case,for me this profession must be choose by our next generation,here we gets lots of scope plus rights,with lots of status. | |
| Posted by Shobhan |
16/07/2008 12:43:10 |
| To be specialised in a particular area is good for the clients, so that they can approach lawyers according to their needs. But a lawyer can be specialised in different aspects of law unlike doctors | |
| Posted by Shubhangi Patil |
16/07/2008 11:51:06 |
| According to me its not necessary to specialize | |
| Posted by Kumar Arvind |
16/07/2008 00:59:39 |
| Yes. For legal practices, a lawyer needs to be specialise for getting in & outs of that particular specialise field. | |
| Posted by varadha |
15/07/2008 22:11:51 |
| yes there is a necessity | |
| Posted by rakhi |
15/07/2008 17:39:37 |
| if we are in any field,we should specialist in that field,same in legal proffesion.we should know all areas about what are we doing. | |
| Posted by Prakash Yedhula |
15/07/2008 16:00:16 |
| I feel after a few years of practice, one needs to specialize on a particular filed on practice. Like arbitration, tax (central excise, customs, income tax etc), company laws etc are specialized fields and there is good scope for the same | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
