Should seniority be followed in the appointment of Supreme Court judges? |
|
| Yes | 70 % |
 |
|
| No | 26 % |
|
|
|
| Can't Say | 3 % |
|
|
|
| Total Votes Cast : 175 | |
| Submitted By - Rajendran Nallusamy | Read Comments |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
26/12/2009 22:13:57 |
| Judges should be selected on the basis of voting by lawyers of the home region, since they are the right watchers of the caliber of the judges of their region. Judges committees should be stripped of the selection process in order to avoid favouritism and corruption. Further puisne judges shall also be re-appointed in the same manner until they become permanent judges. | |
| Posted by Vinod Singh Tomar |
28/11/2008 15:07:09 |
| Seniority and legal knowledge both must be evaluated and weighed before recommending for the judgship of both High courts and for Supreme Court respectively. | |
| Posted by rajashekarreddy |
28/11/2008 13:12:47 |
| seniority must | |
| Posted by Satyendra |
28/11/2008 01:05:33 |
| offcourse senoiority is ultimate criteria for deciding such appointment | |
| Posted by amitkaur |
27/11/2008 21:52:44 |
| YES , AS A PERSON ACCURE KNOWLEDGE AND EXPERTISE THROGH HIS LIFE'S WORK & EXPERIENCE. I THINK IT MATTERS A LOT . | |
| Posted by anuradha |
24/11/2008 15:02:40 |
| The seniority cant be ignored why not to divide in 50% seniority and 50% talent. | |
| Posted by Dnyaneshwar |
24/11/2008 09:20:46 |
| Because it help as mentor | |
| Posted by Ashok Priyadarshi Nayak |
24/11/2008 00:21:56 |
| Knowledge and maturity is the main asset of any SC Judge. it is apt to say that these attributes do not solely come from seniority. the man with more potentiality, irrespective of his term at the bar is the best man to be on the Judge's Chair. | |
| Posted by aruntrivedi |
23/11/2008 16:19:22 |
| yes, it should be. | |
| Posted by ashok kumar |
22/11/2008 23:26:08 |
| For the merit and knowledge seniority is no barier, it can not prohibit a person to go ahead if he possess every thing | |
| Posted by santhosh kumar.m |
22/11/2008 15:11:47 |
| seniority is the best elgibility for appointment of supreme court judges | |
| Posted by vaishali |
22/11/2008 10:10:38 |
| as per my scenerio,seniority should be consider.As its also one of the imp factor 4 elevated to the supreme court judge. | |
| Posted by Nikita Jain |
21/11/2008 15:17:36 |
| Nothing else should matter but the cases the judge has dealt with till date.. His application of law, and skill of interpretation in each case should be the bench mark of appointment..!!!! | |
| Posted by M.G.RAJESWRI |
21/11/2008 13:57:16 |
| yes. exp of judges depends upon seniority. so it has to be one of the criteria | |
| Posted by Sridharan Iyengar |
20/11/2008 22:44:50 |
| Seniority consideration is one level. Amoung the efficient persons, senior one can be considered. Seniority should not be the only crieteria Sridharn | |
| Posted by SETHURAMAN |
20/11/2008 16:00:21 |
| Seniority alone should not be followed for the appointment of Supreme Court judges other aspects like track record , the way of delivering judgments etc should play a vital role. | |
| Posted by M. PIRAVI PERUMAL |
20/11/2008 13:10:58 |
| Seniority must not be the sole criteria. Others aspects like track record, integrity etc. must be taken into account. | |
| Posted by Sanjay K Jha |
20/11/2008 10:00:37 |
| Yes, definitely. There is a saying that the older the lawyer the better the lawyer, one thing. The second is- this criteria avoids unnecessary political intervention in appointment of Supreme Court Judges. This might be sole reason of seniority. | |
| Posted by ravikumarbcombl |
19/11/2008 15:33:36 |
| Seniority should be followed but not in all cases.. suppose the personality is an extraordianry one and professionally sound ..... here the seniority should not refrain the eligible person to achieve certain levels.... | |
| Posted by rahul |
19/11/2008 12:45:35 |
| no | |
| Posted by ca.bhupendrashah |
18/11/2008 22:51:44 |
| seniority leads to exp | |
| Posted by Md Amjad Ali |
18/11/2008 10:58:49 |
| Talllent should be consider not seniority | |
| Posted by Ajay kumar singh |
17/11/2008 18:40:01 |
| talent should be given preference and not the seniority. | |
| Posted by Manish Singh |
17/11/2008 15:24:01 |
| never, only competence should be given preference. | |
| Posted by Manish Singh |
17/11/2008 15:22:54 |
| never, only competence should be given preference. | |
| Posted by Mahesh |
17/11/2008 09:47:39 |
| It is not seniority but quality of judges that matters. Hence while appointing judges, it is important to take into consideration the qualification, knowledge and integrity than just seniority. | |
| Posted by Adv.Shine Thomas |
16/11/2008 12:50:30 |
| Yes ofcourse. | |
| Posted by Zulfiqar Ali Khan |
15/11/2008 21:23:08 |
| It is not necessary all seniour advocates are expert, i have so many people practicing from more than 15 yrs they have only nothing else | |
| Posted by Pruthveshkumar |
15/11/2008 19:17:59 |
| yes of course becoz it diteclty effect to work of judge | |
| Posted by SANJAY DIXIT |
15/11/2008 15:24:55 |
| In my views "Seniority" should not be ignored in the appointment of Supreme Court Judges. | |
| Posted by G. ARAVINTHAN |
15/11/2008 13:15:04 |
| Seniority is the apt thing for appointing Supreme Court Judges | |
| Posted by RADHAKRISHNA.A |
14/11/2008 19:12:21 |
| seniory from the cj's and also vacancy from the state should also be taken in to consideration for elevation to the supreme court | |
| Posted by A. A. JOSE |
14/11/2008 10:38:30 |
| MERIT PLUS SENIORITY BE FOLLOWED IN THE APPOINTMENT OF SUPREME COURT JUDGES. SENIORITY ALONE SHOULD NOT BE THE CRITERIA. FURTHER, AN INDEPENDENT AUTHORITY SHOULD EVALUATE THE MERIT OF THE CANDIDATE. | |
| Posted by Tribhuwan Pandey |
13/11/2008 23:16:09 |
| Yes this only the procedure in present scenerio. There is no criteria how much some one is intelligent and better than his senior. If senior is not possess the quality for the post no hesitation his junior should be appointed. | |
| Posted by Member (Account Deleted) |
13/11/2008 19:37:58 |
| Any other mode will lead to arbitrariness and ultimately to encroachment by Executive/Parliament. | |
| Posted by Apurva Kumar |
13/11/2008 18:23:49 |
| yes precedent should be followed. | |
| Posted by Rajendran Nallusamy |
13/11/2008 16:24:50 |
| Yes. The seniors among the High court judges should be elevated to the Supreme Court. | |
© 2024 LAWyersclubindia.com. Let us grow stronger by mutual exchange of knowledge.
