cause of action clarity

There is no appeal against the orders passed by CAT, recheck it should be a writ petition.

What are the contents of your writ and counter affidavit has to be perused before making any opinion and oblige.

However, what is the advise of your lawyer engaged / paid by you ?

Why do you need a second opinion / obligation of experts on this platform except the fact it is available free of cost ??

Appeals against Orders: The orders of Central Administrative Tribunal are challenged by way of Writ Petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution before respective High Court in whose territorial jurisdiction the Bench of the Tribunal is situated.

Your matter, it appears, has been remanded back. What is its present status?

you are not able to convey the problem.                     

If you had received notice from high court about the pending writ petition, you my file a vakalatnama through your advocate and wait for the listing, you can argue on it when the case is listed for hearing

The querist, as could be understood from his various postings, has number of issues regards to service - regularisation of past service, termination and incidental issues on account of termination thereafter. He has filed cases in the CAT as well as the High Court; in some cases, he had appeared in person.

Participants in this platform are more than willing to assist him; more than assisting, it would be a learning experience as well.

However, the querist has chosen to facts in piecemeal and in a disjointed fashion, often placing facts and issues out of context and in many cases, placing the cart before the horse. I had suggested him, more than once, to make precise and comprehensive posting(s) so that others comprehend and make meaningful suggestions, but with no avail.

As such, I am left with no option but to avoid responding to his queries and postings hereafter.

basically paymnt of gratuity act applies to those employees on whom there is no gratuity scheme.  It is not understood as to on what ground CAT has accepted your plea and its feasibility ofg success in High Court cannot be commented.

Further, experts here are not your legal / IT  Assistants.

You are giving OA No but do not disclose he CAT bench.  lease do not expect the experts to spy around the entire website of CAT and then read the judgement and then favour you with free advise.