New amendment in Rape law- anti men legislation
Some time back Law Minister promised gender neutral laws in four years. After the promise "Women Reservation Bill" was introduced, an epitome of Gender Neutral Law. Now, Criminal Law Amendemnt Bill, 2010 is being proposed, Draft amendment bill is available here:
https://mha.nic.in/writereaddata/12700472381_CriminalLaw(Amendment)Bill2010.pdf
The definition of "s*xual assault" is gender biased against men. It says three things-
A. Sexual assault can be committed only by "Men".
B. Sexual assault can be committed only against a "women".
C. There cannot be any s*xual assault by a woman or against a man.
Another epitome of gender neutral law.
The definition has been so widened that almost everything is s*xual assault, if alleged by a woman against man. Look at the definition- you put a finger in women's mouth, it is s*xual assault attracting minimum seven years. In fact if you put a spoon in your daughters or girl friend mouth to feed her, you can be held guilty of s*xual assault.
Even in cases of "Sexual Abuse of Minors", [Section 376C(1)], the law has been drafted so as to make s*xual intercourse by a women with minor male "not an offence of s*xual abuse of minor".
The procedure and evidence is also being made anti-men, so that they are not able to defend themselves.
This is another instance of gender biased society against men. The society wants to enslave men by keeping them under constant threat of rape accusation. Men needs to stop any interaction with women.
The proposed amendments are Anti-Men and hence it should be opposed.
https://mha.nic.in/writereaddata/1270047
The definition of "s*xual assault" is gender biased against men. It says three things-
A. Sexual assault can be committed only by "Men".
B. Sexual assault can be committed only against a "women".
C. There cannot be any s*xual assault by a woman or against a man.
Another epitome of gender neutral law.
The definition has been so widened that almost everything is s*xual assault, if alleged by a woman against man. Look at the definition- you put a finger in women's mouth, it is s*xual assault attracting minimum seven years. In fact if you put a spoon in your daughters or girl friend mouth to feed her, you can be held guilty of s*xual assault.
Even in cases of "Sexual Abuse of Minors", [Section 376C(1)], the law has been drafted so as to make s*xual intercourse by a women with minor male "not an offence of s*xual abuse of minor".
The procedure and evidence is also being made anti-men, so that they are not able to defend themselves.
This is another instance of gender biased society against men. The society wants to enslave men by keeping them under constant threat of rape accusation. Men needs to stop any interaction with women.
The proposed amendments are Anti-Men and hence it should be opposed.
