LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Adinath@Avinash Patil (advocate)     13 October 2009

CASE LAW LIMITATION CONTEMPT OF COURT

CONTEMPT OF COURTS ACT SS 2[B]AND20--- CONTINUING CONTEMPT--PETITION FILED ON 4TH JULY 2002 ALLEGING THAT THE DEFENDANTS HAVE CREATED THIRD PARTY INTEREST IN SUIT PREMISES IN BRACH OF INJUNCTION GRNTED BY COURT ON 24 TH JUNE 1993- PETITIONER IN AFFIDAVIT FILED BEFORE SMALL CAUSES COURT ON 13 TH DECEMBER,2000 DEPOSED ABOUT THEIR KNOWLEDGE ABOUT THE CREATION OF THE THIRD PARTY INTEREST-HELD, THE ACT IS COMPLETED BY THE DEFENDANTS AND IS NOT A CONTINUING WRONG--LIMITATION WOULD HAVE TO BE RECKONED FROM THE DATE OF KNOLEDGE ACQUIRED BY THE PETITIONER IN RELATION TO EXISTENCE OF THAT FACT --PETITION IS TIME BARRED BY LIMITATION. MAHENDRA BUILDERS V/S PARVEZ GHASWALA AND OTHERS.

CONTEMPT PETITION 282/2002

DECIDED ON 31/03/2006[BOMBAY]

MAHARASHTRA LAW JURNOL 2006[3]668.



Learning

 1 Replies

Ajay Bansal (Advocate)     22 November 2009

Yes


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register