Samudreji, No disprespect is meant to you or any reader in my answers below, I will try to answer all your queries to the best of my ability. Please feel free to agree or disagree.
"you know that I am following your almost every posting. I know and even everyone know that everyone have rights to self defence and to have GUN for this peurpose."
Then where is the problem?
"But I didn't get you as to whether you want to say that the Government should distribute GUNs with Voter ID to every citizen at attaining the ge of 18 years or what?"
Whether there is any Constitution or there is no Constitution, Fundamental Rights are always there, they are prexisting. No Constitution "grants" any fundamental rights to the people. It merely "guarantees" those fundamental rights to people which are most likely to be violated by the State. Right to Keep and Bear Arms is a Fundamental Right guaranteed to it citizens by the Constitution of India under Articles 19 and 21. You are doing great injustice by comparing a Fundamental Right(i.e. RKBA) with a mere Constitutional Right(i.e. Right to Vote). If some foreign power or dictator forcibly takes over this country, he may change the Constitution forcibly as per his wish and remove the Constitutional right to vote. Then what will you do? You will have no option but to exercise your fundamental rights against the wishes of the dictator. Which fundamental right do you think will be the most important for you? Why there is 2nd Amendment done to the US Constitution? Because the Right to Keep and Bear Arms defines the relation between the ruler and the ruled. What kind of relation do you want between the ruler and the ruled?
Fundamental Rights are those rights without which the life of people become miserable. When you are saying:
"Many times I felt to have GUN while passing through Jungles mostly after a speech since there are many fundamentalist communals who may not like our movement of making aware people about their equal emocratic rights"
Why do you feel like this? Because you are not able to enjoy your fundamental right of RKBA and feeling miserable and helpless at that point. Am I right or wrong? Please give an honest answer.
"Not exactly first that but I say that identify the social crminals who breaks your equal democratic rights and start hitting on their back so they will not even think to keep their hand up toward you."
You are talking of democratic rights. First please decide which is more important to you, your fundamental rights or your democratic rights? For me my fundamental rights are sacred and much, much, much more important than my democratic rights. If I don't have fundamental rights, what will I do with my democratic rights? If people have their fundamental rights, they can grab their democratic rights. They won't have to beg for there democratic rights. The opposite is simply NOT true.
"Since my apperance itself creats fear in my enemies so I don't want to have an extra headache to maintain a GUN. My appearance and words anre more than a GUN and Bullets."
Please be honest. Are you not contradicting yourself? You earlier said "Many times I felt to have GUN while passing through Jungles..........................................." You are free to take decision about your own life, but is it correct to force your decision on others?
"(To make the Garden free from these OWLs we need of LIGHT IF EDUCATION AND AWARENESS OF EQUAL DEMOCRATIC RIGHTS and not a GUN)."
Light of education and awareness is always needed but they are not always enough. There are also certain truths, just like a fish cannot live without water, no ruler can be a ruler without the power of a gun. Please tell me which government(ruler) in this world will agree to disarm itself? It will always want to disarm the people under one pretext or the other. If the government is of the people, by the people, for the people, then why does it fear the people and not trust the people? Laws disarming citizens proclaim that the government is the master, not the servant, of the people. What do you want people to be? Masters or servants?
"So the first need is to spread education and awareness in every citizen regarding their equal democratic right"
I see many ONLY well "educated" and "aware" people, but they are not able to enjoy their democratic rights. Why? Because they are not able to enjoy their fundamental rights in the very first place. The criminals backed by vested interests are enjoying their fundamental rights, they are able to threaten, intimidiate, do whatever is needed to prevent these "educated" and "aware" people from excersising their democratic rights. Do you think if you ONLY "educate" and make "aware" all the people of this country will that drive away the criminals and mafia out of elections and adminstration?
"clean the Governance, Administration and Society from the communal ULLUs who are seated everywhere and making differences in people and caused for every injustice since thousands years and still grabbed powerful posts in the Governance and Administration."
Please do not think the communal people are ULLUS because they really know how to fool people, grab power and stay in power. Are they not ULLUS those who do not understand what defines the relationship between the State and the Citizens. Are they not ULLUS those who think that those who wrote the 2nd Amendment to the US Constitution were ULLUS. Are they not ULLUS those who do not understand that the bureacrats ruling this country show the colonial mindset of slaves turned into masters. What are they afraid of? Why they want to keep people disarmed? Logically, rethinking an archaic law of the British Raj that enforced the bondage?
If you read this https://www.lawyersclubindia.com/forum/Only-1-Gurkha-soldier-fights-off-40-train-robbers--33071.asp There were hundreds of unarmed people sitting. ONLY 1 person armed with just one Khukri is able to drive away 40 criminals. How? What makes the difference? Had he been without a Khukri, would he been able to make the difference? Which kind of people the criminals want? Armed or unarmed? Same rule applies to criminals sitting in the Government. This is the reason martial/militia traditions among people is important. This is the reason behind the 2nd Amendment to US Constitution.
"A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed." - Second Amendment to the U.S. Constitution
What is the militia? It is the whole people, except for a few public officials. To disarm the people is the best and most effectual way to enslave them. I hope you are able to get the point.
.
