HOW CAN I BE SAFE FROM 498A

I AM JAVED,THIS IS A CASE OF MY ELDER BROTHER.MY SISTER IN LAW REGISTERED A CASE OF 498A AGAINST MY BROTHER AND MY FAMILY...WE TOOK A STAY FROM ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT....SO PLEASE ME THAT NOW WHAT SHOULD WE DO?????WE A WRITTEN DAIRY OF MY SISTER IN LAW IN WHICH SHE WROTE THAT MY BROTHER NEWER TRIED TO HARASS HER......SO ANY SUGGESTION FOR US????????

Don't worry too much and also don't try to be too honest to abide to this draconian law. Make strategy to fight smart against this terrorism.

Read this following news - this is the judicial system. Rs.64 crore corruption case closed just like that. So try to be smart to fight against this legal terrorism.

Centre to drop `Q' case

New Delhi, Sept. 29: The Centre on Tuesday told the Supreme Court that it has decided to withdraw the case against Italian businessman Ottavio Quattrocchi for his alleged involvement in the Rs 64-crore Bofors payoffs case.

It told the court that all efforts to get Mr Quattrocchi extradited had failed. The Centre in arriving at its decision also cited a 2004 judgment of the Delhi high court in which the court had said no case had been made out against him.

Appearing for the Centre, solicitor general of India Gopal Subramanium told a bench comprising Chief Justice K.G. Balakrishnan, Justice P. Sathasivam and Justice B.S. Chauhan that the government has taken a final decision to withdraw the prosecution and close the case after all efforts to extradite Mr Quattrocchi had failed.

Mr Subramanium told the court that the Central government has consented to the withdrawal of prosecution of Mr Quattrocchi. He added, "We have to take a call on the matter and government has taken a call after considering all aspects." The SGI said the CBI and the Centre took into consideration the February 4, 2004 verdict of the Delhi high court, which had held that there was not an iota of evidence against the businessman under the Prevention of Corruption Act and, as such, no appeal was filed against the decision.

The bench said it could do little if the matter was not alive in the trial court. "There is no necessity to keep the matter pending in this court. It appears that they (CBI) want to withdraw the case," the bench said. It posted the case to December 11 for further hearing.

Earlier, in his petition opposing the stand taken by the Centre and the CBI, advocate Ajay Agrawal, who had moved the SC against the de-freezing of Mr Quattrocchi' s bank account in London, had alleged that "the entire government is trying to protect Quattrocchi. Somebody has to protect the rule of law. My petition and applications have to be heard by this court." He added that the courts had earlier treated his petition as "serious".

Mr Agrawal had said in his petition that Mr Quattrocchi has been treated by this government as "the son-in-law of this country." However, the SGI had objected to the reference and had maintained that the CBI had tried to get him extradited following the red corner notice (RCN) issued against him but could not succeed.

HOW CAN I BE SAFE FROM 498A

4 Replies

Centre to drop `Q' case

Leave a reply

Recent Topics

Related Threads

Popular Discussion

Browse by Category