LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

R.R. KRISHNAA (Legal Manager)     12 February 2010

Lawyers not liable under consumer act: SC

Lawyers not liable under consumer Act: SC:

NEW DELHI: The Supreme Court on Monday stayed a ruling of the apex consumer forum holding that services rendered by an advocate to his client in the course of litigation be covered under the provisions of Consumer Protection Act.

A Bench comprising Justices L S Panta and B Sudershan Reddy stayed the ruling of National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC), which was challenged by a large number of advocate bodies after lawyers raised a hue and cry over the prospect of being sued by clients for deficient service.

The appeals were filed by Bar of Indian Lawyers, Delhi High Court Bar Association and Bar Council of India. One of the lawyers' bodies represented by advocate Jasbir Malik argued that lawyers rendered legal assistance and not service to the clients.

One Devender Kumar Gandhi had filed a complaint before District Consumer Redressal Forum alleging deficiency of service against his lawyer M Mathai. The district forum on June 1, 2000, held the lawyer liable and asked him to pay Rs 3,000 as compensation for mental agony and another Rs 1,000 as cost.

On the appeal filed by the lawyer, the state commission reversed the finding and said that lawyers were not liable to be proceeded against as the services rendered by them did not come within the ambit of the consumer law.

However, the NCDRC set aside the state commission's verdict and held that if there was deficiency in service rendered by lawyers, complaint under Consumer Protection Act was maintainable against them.

 

 

https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/Lawyers-not-liable-under-consumer-Act-SC/articleshow/4396828.cms



Learning

 8 Replies

N.K.Assumi (Advocate)     12 February 2010

Thank you for the information.

rajesh saharan (ADVOCATE)     12 February 2010

thanx for the information...

V. VASUDEVAN (LEGAL COUNSEL)     13 February 2010

 Thanx Krishna

vasudevan


(Guest)

Sir, The heading of the post appears to be misleading. (No offence meant)  Supreme Court has only stayed the NCRDC order but has not yet ruled that lawyers are not liable under the consumer act.

girishankar (manager)     17 February 2010

Thanx

sanjay sharma (advocate)     30 June 2010

a lot of thanks

 

sanjay sharma

SRIKANTH MYLAVARAPU (SENIOR OFFICER (LEGAL))     01 July 2010

yes lawyers not liable under consumer Act

Sanjay Sadawarte (Medical Officer)     06 July 2010

Lawyer should be held responsible for negligence. As it is a monopoly business and most lawyers practice out side the court only by doing settelements. they donot attend the case till it gets dissmissed for default. It should refered from such cases that the lawyer is no moreloyal to his client and is purchased by the opposite party, The courts should take cognisance of such behaviour and should sumoto lodge the complaint at bar council as well as with police to find out the truth why the lawyer remained absent at the case?


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register