Dear Mr. Ashok Srivastava,
I have perused your Query, here above; seeking remedy other than taking shelter of the provisions laid u/s 24-B of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 as against an ex parte Order passed by DCDRF. Through said Order the Opposite Party has been asked to pay the decreetal amount.
As per your sayings the case was decided without seeking expert opinion on alleged defective (manufacturing) vehicle.
As per provisions laid u/s 15 of the said Act, 1986 an Appeal can be preferred as against the said ex parte in the Hon'ble Court of State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission of the jurisdiction framing thereby on & amongst the following main GROUNDS :-
a) Order passed by DCDRF is an ex parte Order & u/s 22-A being aggrieved party appeal has been preferred.
b) Order has been passed without complying the mandatory provisions laid u/s 13 (1) (c) when the Complaint alleged the manufacturing Defect i the Goods (vehicle).
c) Order of DCDRF is erroneous in the eyes of law & on its facts.
Hope, you take step for filling the suggested Appeal before Hon'ble SCDRC having competent jurisdiction, the erroneous Order passed by said DCDRF would be set a side & the concerned Opposite Party would definitely get relief.
Any further advise if required, you may fell free to approach the undersigned through the website noted here under. Thanks,
SHIVESH KUMAR SINHA, Advocate
Legal Adviser - www.powertoconsumer.in
