@ Rohit Sharma
I have some query so felt like asking in this forum only as related to RTI in court
I gave application that I want to see brief , because my late mother is party to suit
Judge did not allow me instead "Wrote remark" Other party to file say and kept in brief and denied Discoveries and Inspection (Unde civil manual Discoveries and Inspection - Maharashtra there is third party procedure )
Next day I gave simple application that I want to see the brief since mother died in 2007. It is very natural you can not take necessary steps without understanding brief when you are totally blind. Judge said you be party to suit then only you can see the brief and rejected and gave my application back. (Well contradictory to civil Manual)
When other party came I discussed it was Suit for restoration , so I felt better hold on , since suit against dead person is nullity and necessary steps not taken by opp. party restorration suit is abeted.
I was wondering , Whether Judge was right in denying brief under circumstances and taking stand that you can not see brief unless until you are party to suit. Well to my legal knowledge it is wrong. because you need to study before giving application .
Well i did not raise the point of civil manual because Judge was aggitated . Additionally I felt after studying again , Judge told bit wrong , well in my interest let restoration of suit gets abeted , Why to give abetment set aside application myself only. And if other party file delay condolence and abetmentment set aside applciation I should contest.
So question what are the remedies available when Judge even does not take Application for discoveries and insepection of brief and pass oral order that you cannot see the brief.
Now if I move application under RTI to PIO under RTI Act certainly PIO will take stand brief denied because Judge has prohibited you orally and there is provision in RTI where court prohibits person for information it can not be given .
Under circumstances what remedies are available ?