prabir 30 November 2017
P. Venu (Advocate) 01 December 2017
The facts posted are insufficient to make any suggestion.
prabir 01 December 2017
The facts are defacto complainant completed her evidence in 8 years. Following which, there were 4 PWs including I/O, but none appeared on behalf of prosecution in spite of several summons and warrants. The evidence of prosecution is closed. A 340 application is also lying in court undisposed. At this stage, can the accused pray for termination/acquittal
P. Venu (Advocate) 01 December 2017
The parties can proceed further if the evidence of the prosecution is closed. Why340 petition?
prabir 01 December 2017
The 340 appllication is for giving false evidence, suppression and fabrication of facts, and gross contradictions in FIR, examination-in-chief and x-exam of PW-1. Question is whether it is possible to take any step from the side of the defence.