Advocate discrepancy

The suit is stated to have been decreed in favour of defendant, which is not possible in law. h

Subsequently you have stated that the defendant have become plaintiff for the same property, is it true story / statement ?????

Two contracdictory statements make the post like an examination hall or moot court topic.

Sir, in previous case defendant is absolute owner of the property. in present case that same property was grabbed new party. For that the absolute owner of the same property again filed a petition for recovery of possession of the same property. In earlier case decree was given in favor of defendant. That same defendant became petitioner in present pending case for recovery of possession. In earlier case advocate was defendant side. In present pending case the same advocate is for defendant side whis is unethical. Is this point be shown to court in amendment petition sir?
regards, vijayakumar

Your posting and the clarification attempted is a riddle than a query.

Please post simple facts avoiding assumptions and presumptions.

The advocate fought for his client in a previous suit where you were a party.

Now in a different suit he is fighting against the same party on behalf of a new party. 

The suit is different and the parties are different in the new suit, hence there is no illegality in it