Sir, my father's original criminal complaint dated 14.11.2018 as follows: Address of the VAT Registration Certificate was amended fraudulently from Shop No. 213 into Shop Nos. 213, 214 and 215 using fabricated lease deed dated 01.01.1997, by his tenant and the concerned commercial tax officers. Therefore, on 07.08.2021, the magistrate court ordered to register the FIR against the tenant and two commercial tax officers after pursuing connected records and evidences. Unfortunately, on 15.11.2021, the police registered FIR with respect to tenant only.
Afterwards, on 20.11.2021, the concerned sale tax officers (proposed accused) moved to Madurai Bench of Madras High Court by changing the content of the complaint in their affidavit as follows: The tenant obtained the TNGST registration certificate by submitting fabricated lease deed dated 01.01.1997. In the high court affidavit, the sales tax officers supressed their role in VAT Registration Certificate Address Amendment.
Without considering our strong objection of not to give an audiance to the proposed accused person, the high court allowed the petition of sales tax officials by stating that Police is right by not registering FIR against sales tax officials. Unfortunately, high court didn't refer our original complaint petition, magistrate court petition and relevant documents. Only considered the sales tax officials [proposed accused] affidavit for writing the entire judgment.
Therefore, we took this matter before Supreme Court, and unfortunately, without hearing any of our concerns, our SLP was dismissed within few seconds without assigning any reason. Now, Police is trying to follow the High Court's amended complaint [but not our original complaint petition dated 14.11.2018] as per whims and wishes of sales tax officers. The chargesheet was filed before the magistrate court with the fabricated 161(3) statements. How would you handle this situation?
