It is common knowledge that court is based on rules. If fundamental rules are violated then it leads to fair trial.
CPC clearly specifies that the first time reply in a court notice should always be served on the opposite party and that same reply should be filed with the court registry. The court registry insists on proof of having served the copy on the opposite party before it accepts the filing. Thus, this mechanism brings about semblance to the entire process.
Unfortunate things have happened in a case that I am fighting. Opposite party by passed both of the above rules and handed over the reply to the judge in court during the court proceedings. I got stupified. This immobilised me and put me into great inconvenience. I was thus forced to remain silent. The court gave its orders based on what they submitted.
I have now realised:
1. That my rights have been violated.
2. They have submitted FALSE AFFIDAVIT on oath.
Are these contempt of court or not?
