Case laws on dishonour of cheques

Thanks, Rampal.

You have provide the case as given below:

I have searched it using Google Search. I am in need of such a case which is mentioned above as already described by you.

Could you please provide me the complete case.

I shall be very thankful to you.

You have provide the case as given below:

I have searched it using Google Search. I am in need of such a case which is mentioned above as already described by you.

 You may contact me at bhawaniinvestments@gmail.com or rahulg1961@gmail.com

Could you please provide me the complete case.

I shall be very thankful to you.

This is very valuable information you have compiled, thanks so much. However I note that in item 14 - quote:

14. Accused refused to receive notice : Where accused have refused to receive notice, even then complaint to be filed after expiry of 15 days from the date of receipt of notice (1997 (3) crimes 445). In case of refusal to receive the notice, it amounts to acceptance of notice and date of refusal to receive such notice shall be treated as the date of receipt of such notice. In such case the period of fifteen days has to be computed from the date of refusal (AIR 1996 SC 330; AIR 1989 SC 630)

unquote

The ammendments allow 30 days for filling of complaint after refusal/ accectance, i.e. receipt date on A/D card. whereas in the above sitation it is mentioned filling must be 15 days from refusal.??

Can you please clearify.

dear friend,

i submit sm important case rules regarding 138 NIact which helps u to solve the metters of this act these are as follows:

1. Supreme court case in year 2006 about NIA 138, that liabilities on accused should

2. 2007 WLC SC

3. (a) kamlaksh V/s S. G. maykar laxman

4. Manivennam & ors V/s P.R.aadikeswan

5. Prosecution of Directors in NI Act:-N.K wahi v/s Shekhar singh & ors.

Dear members

pls give information on this point.-If the company is in the business of lending money and accepting deposits, is it still exempted from Money Lenders Act?

IF a co. is doing   "BUSINESS" of  "lending" money  and/or  "deposits"

THEN

1. It has to compulsorily register under the state Money Lenders Act.

AND PLUS

2. It has to mandatorily register under the RBI Act, as well, subject to conditions, as applicable to NBFC's.

Keep Smiling .... Hemant Agarwal

Dear sir

Thanks for your information

have a great day

with regards

ashwini

Legal officer

dear sir

cases are decided on pleadings and evidence so unless your pleadings match with citations than only the citations will help. If you are not able to contradict the story in cross no citation can help you.

Simple example starts from issue of notice. I have seen most of the advocates admit it against their client and further work of other side becomes easy.

Even notice has lot of mistakes and case can not move on even  if you only concentrate on this alone.

How , the opponent has to prove service of notice and same notice to accused which he has produced. If the accused do not admit it is a herculian task for the complainant to prove it.

Very good information  thanks a lot