Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

SP Singhss (Engineer)     09 September 2014

Clarification of "amicus curiae" as in family courts

Pls refer Family court Act 1984, Sec - 13

which says no party to a suit or legal proceeding before a family court shall be entitled, as of right to be represented by a legal practitioner


My Questions are :-

1. If no parties in family courts are entitled to legal practitioners then how are family courts in Delhi full of lawyers representing their clients ?

2. What action can be taken to if I don't want lawyer of opposite party in my case to accompany my wife ?

3. Can this family court sec - 13 be quoted in the court or is there any amendment to this Family court act which is applicable in Delhi ?

4. It is also written legal practitioner can only accompany if he is an "Amicus Curiae", Kindly clarify this ?



Learning

 2 Replies

Tajobsindia (Senior Partner )     09 September 2014

Delhi High Court framed Rules way back in 2010 which is clearly mentioned in below link, make yourself sense reading it down;

 

https://delhihighcourt.nic.in/writereaddata/upload/Notification/NotificationFile_UC2P3T2Q.PDF 

SP Singhss (Engineer)     12 September 2014

Sir link not working


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register  


Related Threads


Loading