My wife has filed for divorce under section 10x. We are yet to complete 1 yr. We went through mediation. I was initiatlly told that there was no expectation of money, but in the end, they (instigated by the lawyer) brought up the matter of compensation. In the interest of not dragging, I agreed. Finally the mediation centre rejected saying some technical reasons.
We then agreed to file a compromise petition in the court. The gist of which is: a) I have no objection for the dissolution of marriage b) my wife will withdraw all allegations against me c) I pay a sum of xyz to my wife d)We both agree that no other claims in the past, present and future will hold e) both of us agree not to interfere in each other lives.
Their lawyer put a spoke in the wheel in th last minute saying (b) has to be removed. I want (b) since I am not in agreement with the allegation levelled in their petition, but want to agree to the divorce as I feel that I made a bad choice.
Two questions:
1. If all that we both want is a divorce, is inclusion of (b) going to create a problem? In other words, is my wife's lawyer reasonable in asking that this be removed? My lawyer says that the judge would not have any problem even if (b) is there. So I am wondering, why is other lawyer insisting? Is this just litigation that will lead to dragging of the case?
2. Am I reasonable in asking that (b) be there? I just want to be true to myself. I have lost on all fronts (financially and emotionally). Now I am paying her only to get rid of the non sense, but I feel that agreeing to allegations is simply too big a price.
3. The clause is drafted as "In view of the above settlement between the parties the petitioner hereby withdraws all the allegations against the respondent." Any better to draft it so that it will be agreeable to both of us.
4. What are my options if we are not able to come to a mutual understanding on this?
Best regards,