LCI Learning

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on LinkedIn

Share on Email

Share More

Prakash Yedhula (Lawyer)     19 January 2010

Mother of all RTIs to the Supreme Court

An RTI application filed before the Supreme Court by a lawyers' body from Bangalore. This forum is the 'KANNADA RAKSHANA VAKEELARA VEDIKE'. (It translates to 'Lawyers Forum for Protection of Kannada'). By the way, this  RTI is, many say, mind blowing and you may never have seen anything like this before. Authenticated copies furnished by the Forum is scanned and attached herewith.
 
Look at the RTI:
 
It says:
 
(a) Concerned Department: Hon’ble Supreme Court of India acting through the appropriate officer in relation to preparation preceding admission of matters in Court.


(b) Particulars of Information required: Please provide information on the approximate duration of time spent by the Hon’ble Justices (Chief Justice of India and Justice B.S.Chauhan)individually and collectively upon a study of the SLP No.CC 21048 of 2009, prior to the calling of the matter for admission on 04-Jan-2010 at Court 1 (Item No.28),

 (i) Details of information required: Date or Dates of study in respect of SLP No.CC 21048 of 2009.

 (ii)Period for which information asked for: Approximate duration of study in relation to date/dates of study in respect of SLP No.CC 21048 of 2009.




Mind blowing? People who have read the entire application are saying so. Here is the entire application, as filed 

 

FORM – 1

FORM OF APPLICATION FOR SEEKING INFORMATION UNDER THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005.

 

To

The Central Public Information Officer

Supreme Court of India

New Delhi – 110 001

1

Name of the Applicant

M.K.Vijay Kumar

2

Address

M.K.Vijay Kumar

President

Kannada Rakshana Vakeelara Vedike

A Registered Society

No.1372, Jyothi Building

1st Floor

4th Main Road, 5th Cross Road

Prakashnagar

Rajajinagar 2nd Block

Bangalore 560 021

3

Particulars of Information

With utmost respects to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India:

In relation to Special Leave Petition No.CC 21048 of 2009 titled ‘Andhra Pradesh Official Language Commission And Anr. v. R.Gandhi And Ors,’ the following statement of facts is first noted:

The matter was filed under Article 136 of the Constitution of India in relation to Order dated 05-Aug-2008 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Madras in Writ Petition No.18810 of 2008 (PIL) titled‘R.Gandhi v. Union of India And Ors.’.

The content of the SLP was widely published and discussed over the internet by enthusiastic scholars and legal professionals from diverse regions of the world.

The matter was listed on 04-Jan-2010 before Court 1 comprising Hon’ble Chief Justice, K.G.Balakrishnan and Hon’ble Justice, B.S.Chauhan as item No.28 for the day.

That the common counsel for petitioners, Sri K.V.Dhananjay, was present in Court to render arguments upon the hearing of the matter and that, upon the calling of the matter, the Hon’ble Supreme Court refused to hear arguments of the counsel for petitioners, Sri K.V.Dhananjay and proceeded to dismiss the matter.

The dismissal by the Supreme Court of the said matter without affording opportunity to the counsel to argue upon the cause has been widely reported and resented in the media in Karnataka.

 

(a) Concerned Department:

Hon’ble Supreme Court of India acting through the appropriate officer in relation to preparation preceding admission of matters in Court.

 

(b) Particulars of Information required:

Please provide information on the approximate duration of time spent by the Hon’ble Justices (Chief Justice of India and Justice B.S.Chauhan) individually and collectively upon a study of the SLP No.CC 21048 of 2009, prior to the calling of the matter for admission on 04-Jan-2010 at Court 1 (Item No.28),

Please provide information on:

 

(i) Details of information required:

Date or Dates of study in respect of SLP No.CC 21048 of 2009.

 

 

(ii)Period for which information asked for:

Approximate duration of study in relation to date/dates of study in respect of SLP No.CC 21048 of 2009.

 

 

(iii)other details

Any other information that may be construed as supplemental in relation to information sought above.

4

A fee of Rs.10- (Rupees ten only) has been deposited in the Office of the Public Information Officer vide receipt No.             ………….dated

 

Place: New Delhi

Date: 16-Jan-2010

M.K.Vijaykumar

Signature of Applicant



Learning

 4 Replies

girishankar (manager)     19 January 2010

Its Great Mr. Prakash Garu please guide Mr.Murali somayajulu let the poor man get Justice thr U people....Thanks....

Adinath@Avinash Patil (advocate)     21 January 2010

  VERY GOOD PRAKASH .

Aftab4u (PVT EMPLOYEE)     21 January 2010

Prakash Sir always rocks !!

Aftab

DR.SANAT KUMAR DASH (Eye Specialist)     29 January 2010

 PRAKASH    JI,      IT        IS        A         VERY        GOOD        TOPIC.


Leave a reply

Your are not logged in . Please login to post replies

Click here to Login / Register